Author Topic: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.  (Read 40954 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #300 on: March 24, 2016, 10:27:PM »
I thought this was the Robert Boutflour thesis..

It was - Julie was probably asked about it by Jones so she made a note of it. She has never said she thought it used it. It's just people grasping at straws again.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #301 on: March 24, 2016, 10:33:PM »
It was - Julie was probably asked about it by Jones so she made a note of it. She has never said she thought it used it. It's just people grasping at straws again.

Grasping straws?  She has Wet suit and then bicycle written In bullet points on the same page! Gimme a break  8)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #302 on: March 24, 2016, 10:35:PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvia_Seegrist

This woman fired at anything, missing most of what she aimed at - not one shot missed in the Bamber case. Sheila wasn't familiar with guns and had never seen this particular weapon before. In the link you have posted, the woman actually went out and purchased a rifle - clearly she was familiar with guns - certainly more familiar than Sheila - and she STILL missed.

Jeremy just happens to leave out the gun the very night Sheila has a psychotic episode? Her father lives JUST long enough to tell Jeremy she was on the rampage and he just happens to leave the phone off the hook to prove there was a telephone call? Funny that the operator listening in on the open line, heard no one fighting for their lives, didn't hear any shots or screams - nuthin!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #303 on: March 24, 2016, 10:37:PM »
Grasping straws?  She has Wet suit and then bicycle written In bullet points on the same page! Gimme a break  8)

And? She had spoken to Jones on many occasions, and it is likely that he mentioned his theories to Julie to see if they had any relevance. Julie NEVER mentioned any of it in her statements or on the stand. Gasping is what I said and grasping is what I meant!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #304 on: March 24, 2016, 10:38:PM »
If anyone had been grasping at straws it was RWB. The man was beyond desperate---------with his bike scenario,wet-suit,use of the Tampax as a barrel-cleaner ( fibres ),the " poofters " and the PI,the hacksaw blade,the silencer, even before JB was arrested he'd dashed to granny Speakmans with a view to changing her will,plenty of hearsay thrown in for good measure. The man was on a mission that was for sure.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #305 on: March 24, 2016, 10:43:PM »
If anyone had been grasping at straws it was RWB. The man was beyond desperate---------with his bike scenario,wet-suit,use of the Tampax as a barrel-cleaner ( fibres ),the " poofters " and the PI,the hacksaw blade,the silencer, even before JB was arrested he'd dashed to granny Speakmans with a view to changing her will,plenty of hearsay thrown in for good measure. The man was on a mission that was for sure.

I agree Lookout, but the wetsuit was never mentioned by Julie, I imagine RWB's theories were bandied about before the trial and those involved knew about them. However, Julie didn't incorporate the wet suit into her testimony so David's notion of some grand conspiracy involing the wet suit has no legs. It's simply written in a list and we don't know why.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21084
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #306 on: March 24, 2016, 10:47:PM »
This woman fired at anything, missing most of what she aimed at - not one shot missed in the Bamber case. Sheila wasn't familiar with guns and had never seen this particular weapon before. In the link you have posted, the woman actually went out and purchased a rifle - clearly she was familiar with guns - certainly more familiar than Sheila - and she STILL missed.

Jeremy just happens to leave out the gun the very night Sheila has a psychotic episode? Her father lives JUST long enough to tell Jeremy she was on the rampage and he just happens to leave the phone off the hook to prove there was a telephone call? Funny that the operator listening in on the open line, heard no one fighting for their lives, didn't hear any shots or screams - nuthin!
An excellent post Caroline.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #307 on: March 24, 2016, 11:02:PM »
An excellent post Caroline.

Thank you Steve.  :)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #308 on: March 24, 2016, 11:11:PM »
This woman fired at anything, missing most of what she aimed at - not one shot missed in the Bamber case. Sheila wasn't familiar with guns and had never seen this particular weapon before. In the link you have posted, the woman actually went out and purchased a rifle - clearly she was familiar with guns - certainly more familiar than Sheila - and she STILL missed.



Well I am not surprised she missed since this is where the shooting took place and still she got 10 people shooting some of them multiple times.

« Last Edit: March 24, 2016, 11:12:PM by david1819 »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #309 on: March 24, 2016, 11:19:PM »
Well I am not surprised she missed since this is where the shooting took place and still she got 10 people shooting some of them multiple times.



Yep, so she was a good shot - Sheila wasn't! She was clearly familiar with guns - Sheila was not.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #310 on: March 24, 2016, 11:20:PM »
I agree Lookout, but the wetsuit was never mentioned by Julie, I imagine RWB's theories were bandied about before the trial and those involved knew about them. However, Julie didn't incorporate the wet suit into her testimony so David's notion of some grand conspiracy involing the wet suit has no legs. It's simply written in a list and we don't know why.

What is the problem with the wet suit?

The relatives were suspicious of JB early on because JB told the police things which didn't reflect reality. So they took notes, wrote diaries, brainstormed theories etc. The wet suit theory from RWB was just a thought, nothing more and nothing less.

Okay, we all might think it's a little far fetched, but RWB was convinced that JB had murdered five members of his family and was trying to figure out how he did it so that the murderous xxxxxxx wouldn't get away with it.

I don't personally go along with that particular theory, but the relatives suspicions of JB being responsible were clearly well placed.


Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #311 on: March 24, 2016, 11:51:PM »
What is the problem with the wet suit?

The relatives were suspicious of JB early on because JB told the police things which didn't reflect reality. So they took notes, wrote diaries, brainstormed theories etc. The wet suit theory from RWB was just a thought, nothing more and nothing less.

Okay, we all might think it's a little far fetched, but RWB was convinced that JB had murdered five members of his family and was trying to figure out how he did it so that the murderous xxxxxxx wouldn't get away with it.

I don't personally go along with that particular theory, but the relatives suspicions of JB being responsible were clearly well placed.

Well placed? If you read RWB diary he believed Jeremy gave his soul to Satan and suspected Brett Collins was involved because he was "gay" RWB was for lack of a better word a bigot who couldn't fathom the idea of a women using a gun.

However I don't blame RWB for his beliefs/views they were the norm for his generation.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #312 on: March 25, 2016, 12:06:AM »
Well placed? If you read RWB diary he believed Jeremy gave his soul to Satan and suspected Brett Collins was involved because he was "gay" RWB was for lack of a better word a bigot who couldn't fathom the idea of a women using a gun.

However I don't blame RWB for his beliefs/views they were the norm for his generation.

His generational take on the world is somewhat irrelevant.

I was asking what the problem with him coming up with a theory and it being a bit far fetched?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #313 on: March 25, 2016, 12:14:AM »
His generational take on the world is somewhat irrelevant.

I was asking what the problem with him coming up with a theory and it being a bit far fetched?

Nothing at all BUT David was suggesting that the theory crossed over to Julie because there was some kind of colusion between her and the family and possibly EP. I was arguing against it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: what do jeremys demands for further tests on the silencer prove.
« Reply #314 on: March 25, 2016, 12:17:AM »
Nothing at all BUT David was suggesting that the theory crossed over to Julie because there was some kind of colusion between her and the family and possibly EP. I was arguing against it.

Oh okay, I haven't seen anything suggesting that.  :-\