0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm using this as an example only - but would you be happy for say Jeremy Bamber to be released from prison in 5 minutes time in order to babysit your grandchildren?
Her thoughts were shocking lookout and Jeremy was done a disservice at trial by his legal team, who should have made far more of her illness and the initial mistakes in the investgation,which might have distracted the jury's attention from other evidence damning to him.
Yes I would.
Steve, simply "making more" of Sheila's illness doesn't signify that there was more to make and doesn't make her a murderer.
It certainly is when they've done nothing.
You have such faith in a murderer but you tell Caroline you don't trust HER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Grow up for God's sake. What sort of a person would ask a question like that anyway
No it doesn't but didn't Carol Ann Lee interview Dr. Ferguson and she herself wrote as an appendage to one sentence only that Sheila believed she could kill her children. I have to ask why more wasn't made of this at trial?
And if you had the choice between Bamber and say Caroline or me, who would you choose?
Would it surprise you if I said NONE of you ??