Sheila's Clean Hands

[Caroline]

It's not the back,is it ?

Yes! It's states that.

[Caroline]

You've lost me. 

[Jan]

If you look at the imprint it would mean the collar was up for the first shot hence the necklace imprint but down for the second shot .

[Jane]

If you look at the imprint it would mean the collar was up for the first shot hence the necklace imprint but down for the second shot .

How might it have changed positions?

[Jan]

How might it have changed positions?

Well as we know she could have been conscious between shots and she could have moved herself for the second shot  or when she possibly put her hand up between shots ?

I don't think it's was moved after the second shot because of the pattern of blood .

Not saying it is relevant although it could back up her being conscious in between shots .

As I have never seen a diagram of how Jeremy is supposed to have shot her without her fighting back I can't comment on how he would have done it .

[Jane]

Well as we know she could have been conscious between shots and she could have moved herself for the second shot  or when she possibly put her hand up between shots ?

I don't think it's was moved after the second shot because of the pattern of blood .

Not saying it is relevant although it could back up her being conscious in between shots .

As I have never seen a diagram of how Jeremy is supposed to have shot her without her fighting back I can't comment on how he would have done it .

Hmm. But as you said to me on another thread, you're making assumptions

[Adam]

It is very offensive to Julie that Bamber has spent 32 years accusing her of trying to frame him of 5x murder. The reason - he (apparently) jilted her.

Then again his mother was shot 8 times & he tried to frame his sister. So the women in his life were just a means to an end.

Not sure why Julie told 5 people what she knew while still with Bamber. Which was before she was jilted.

[lookout]

Hmm. But as you said to me on another thread, you're making assumptions

That was more or less what the case itself was based on anyway.

[Caroline]

If you look at the imprint it would mean the collar was up for the first shot hence the necklace imprint but down for the second shot .

I don't think that's an imprint, just just the blood seeping down the the collar.

[Caroline]

I think people are jumping to conclusions and seeing things that aren't there. Sorry 

[Jan]

I don't think that's an imprint, just just the blood seeping down the the collar.

No the one going horizontally in line with the chain

Zoom in and you can see the pattern of the chain .

[Caroline]

No the one going horizontally in line with the chain

Zoom in and you can see the pattern of the chain .

That's just the stitching.

[Jan]

That's just the stitching.

Stitching on the collar?

[lookout]

The pattern of the chain is a couple of centimetres clear of the stitching.

[Caroline]

I honestly don't know what you're referring to, can you edit the picture to show me?