Questions about the bible :

[Jan]

Well I have just asked for a source that there were four bibles.

As I said bibles are personal things.

Anyway Sheila would certainly have been reading more warped religious material. She massacred her whole family. Except Bamber. It is a surprise she didn't bring this reading material with her.

She didn't just commit this crime because of the alleged supper conversation. June's bible was next to her.

I am not falling for your little tricks any more - ITS HERE ON THE FORUM - USE THE SEARCH BUTTON

[Jan]

These questions must be answered comprehensively. Everything about the bible points to Bamber.

And you must provide you're promised detailed 2016 breakdown of how Sheila committed the massacre. To match the crime scene. 99th request. Bamber's had a bad few weeks on here and needs a boost.

Jeremy has not had a bad few weeks on here ? How can he need a boost? That's a weird comment?

[Jane]

In his last statement he did say he saw her in March and I think he thought she had been discharged too early or something to that affect .

She left a week earlier that he would have liked but she didn't want her first meeting with Christine to take place in a psych clinic. I have no idea WHEN their first meeting was so I'm prepared to think it MAY have been a rouse on Sheila's part to leave.

[Jan]

Well I have just asked for a source that there were four bibles.

As I said bibles are personal things.

Anyway Sheila would certainly have been reading more warped religious material. She massacred her whole family. Except Bamber. It is a surprise she didn't bring this reading material with her.

She didn't just commit this crime because of the alleged supper conversation. June's bible was next to her.



Bibles are not personal things. You can find them in hotel rooms sometimes in some countries

And who are you to say that Sheila would be reading warped religious material?

All anyone can say is what she told her medical team and others about her thoughts? She also thought the CIA were after her - that had nothing to do with religion. I think again whether or not she was responsible that you are showing very little regard or respect for Sheila and her illness . Whatever the truth, she was a victim .

[Jan]

She left a week earlier that he would have liked but she didn't want her first meeting with Christine to take place in a psych clinic. I have no idea WHEN their first meeting was so I'm prepared to think it MAY have been a rouse on Sheila's part to leave.

I think he is covered as far as responsibility because I think there was supposed to be  a further referral and anyway I guess she was free to discontinue any treatment if she so wanted if she was not sectioned at the time.

[Jane]

"Anyway Sheila would certainly have been reading more warped religious material. She massacred her whole family. Except Bamber. It's a surprise she didn't bring this material with her" Perhaps you can provide the source of Sheila's choice of reading material or a title.

[Adam]

It just seems a huge factor of Sheila's alleged suicide/murder was religion. And of course the alleged supper conversation.

Yet she obviously didn't bring any religious books with her. Or did, but chose to find and use June's bible and not use her own book/s.

Anyway, things will become clearer when David provides my ten source requests.

[Jan]

It just seems a huge factor of Sheila's alleged suicide/murder was religion. And of course the alleged supper conversation.

Yet she obviously didn't bring any religious books with her. Or did, but chose to find and use June's bible and not use her own book/s.

Anyway, things will become clearer when David provides my ten source requests.

No Adam you asked the questions - you find the sources .And as we have said many times before anything that is said regarding what went on in the house unless supported by direct evidence is purely supposition or assumption. Just because someone has an opinion and then you think you have proved it wrong does not mean that you are right.

[Adam]

No Adam you asked the questions - you find the sources .And as we have said many times before anything that is said regarding what went on in the house unless supported by direct evidence is purely supposition or assumption. Just because someone has an opinion and then you think you have proved it wrong does not mean that you are right.

Oh no the questions I asked all brutally highlight Bamber's guilt, if cannot be answered. So must be comprehensively answered.

David made a stab but admitted he could not answer or guessed several answers.  I'm sure he is looking for his sources now.

I've never seen a source that Sheila read the bible, or there were four bibles at WHF etc. But have been told this is the case. So look forward to the sources.

My post earlier today on this thread thanked everyone for their assistance.

[Jan]

Oh no the questions I asked all brutally highlight Bamber's guilt, if cannot be answered. So must be comprehensively answered.

David made a stab but admitted he could not answer or guessed several answers.  I'm sure he is looking for his sources now.

I've never seen a source that Sheila read the bible, or there were four bibles at WHF etc. But have been told this is the case. So look forward to the sources.

My post earlier today on this thread thanked everyone for their assistance.

I don't think so .

[Jane]

I don't think so .

I wonder how Adam thinks it possible for anyone to give him satisfactory answers to questions whose ONLY answers -because there appear to be no KNOWN answers- are the ones he chooses to apply.

[Jan]

"Would Sheila only decide to get the bible after killing four other people ?
Dont know  "


A good example. We don't know if she was reading the bible before with her mother . We don't know if she was responsible whether she was alive for a sort time or a long time after the murders?

A more important question why did two officers say the bible was not in the position photographed?

[Jane]

"Would Sheila only decide to get the bible after killing four other people ?
Dont know  "


A good example. We don't know if she was reading the bible before with her mother . We don't know if she was responsible whether she was alive for a sort time or a long time after the murders?

A more important question why did two officers say the bible was not in the position photographed?

"Would Sheila only decide to get the bible after killing four other people"? A prime example of a question whose only answer is the one Adam CHOOSES to apply and given the nature of the beast it'll be the opposite of what anyone else gives.................IF anyone else bothers.

Re the position of the bible. It would carry more weight if the two officers actually SAID what position the bible had previously occupied.

[Adam]

I don't think so .

He must be working on his detailed reconstruction of how Sheila committed the massacre.

[Adam]

With a guilty Bamber it's easy to explain the bible.

He knew where it was.

He wanted to enhance the religious aspect of the frame.

Sheila didn't have any of her own religious books. Or he didn't bother checking. So used June's bible.

I believe it is likely he would check to see if Sheila had any religious books he could use. It would enhance the framing attempt.