Another MASSIVE Lie

[Caroline]

http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/victim-support/support-at-the-scene/family-home-is-a-crime-ccene/media-intrusion/psychological-impact-and-implications-for-recovery/social-and-relationships/advocacy/bodies-and-funerals

[Jane]

I don't imagine he'd have been overly keen to see the results of his handiwork and Julie MAY have been concerned that he'd "loose it" and confess, which would not only have destroyed her chances of marriage, but possibly revealed how much she knew.

[guest154]

I don't imagine he'd have been overly keen to see the results of his handiwork and Julie MAY have been concerned that he'd "loose it" and confess, which would not only have destroyed her chances of marriage, but possibly revealed how much she knew.

It may have been that, Jane. Or it may have been that he was trying to play act how someone in his position would cope/act and what they would say and he thought that someone in his position would not want to see his Parents/sister/nephews dead and that in refusing to do so - he was doing what he thought he should be doing.

Either way, we can thank Jeremy's own supporters and hos official site for yet again pointing out why Bamber is a liar and a terrible source for information when it comes to looking for the truth.

Killing him with kindness, they sure are.

[Jane]

It may have been that, Jane. Or it may have been that he was trying to play act how someone in his position would cope/act and what they would say and he thought that someone in his position would not want to see his Parents/sister/nephews dead and that in refusing to do so - he was doing what he thought he should be doing.

Either way, we can thank Jeremy's own supporters and hos official site for yet again pointing out why Bamber is a liar and a terrible source for information when it comes to looking for the truth.

Killing him with kindness, they sure are.

Good point, Mat. The other thing which occurs to me is that with every support group giving different reasons for his innocence, if -IF!!!- it were anywhere near to being so, he'd never have been convicted in the first place.

[mike tesko]

The only people telling lies in this prosecution were prosecution witnesses, and the Scenes of Crime Officers, themselves...

(1) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmCART1vcCo

[Caroline]

It may have been that, Jane. Or it may have been that he was trying to play act how someone in his position would cope/act and what they would say and he thought that someone in his position would not want to see his Parents/sister/nephews dead and that in refusing to do so - he was doing what he thought he should be doing.

Either way, we can thank Jeremy's own supporters and hos official site for yet again pointing out why Bamber is a liar and a terrible source for information when it comes to looking for the truth.

Killing him with kindness, they sure are.

He was heard to say that he didn't want to identify them and re we supposed to believe that they asked everyone (including Julie) and didn't ask Jeremy to identify HIS family? Compete TWADDLE!

[mike tesko]

He was heard to say that he didn't want to identify them and re we supposed to believe that they asked everyone (including Julie) and didn't ask Jeremy to identify HIS family? Compete TWADDLE!

Listen up, Jeremy did not lie about the sequence, or the order with which police took photographs of the anshuzt rifle against the bedroom window, as opposed to the same rifle, being upon her body...

[Jane]

Listen up, Jeremy did not lie about the sequence, or the order with which police took photographs of the anshuzt rifle against the bedroom window, as opposed to the same rifle, being upon her body...

How would Jeremy know?  He wasn't in the house when the pictures were being taken.

[mike tesko]

How would Jeremy know?  He wasn't in the house when the pictures were being taken.

He didn't know, until later when I drew this to his attention...

[Caroline]

Listen up, Jeremy did not lie about the sequence, or the order with which police took photographs of the anshuzt rifle against the bedroom window, as opposed to the same rifle, being upon her body...

I'm not talking about rifles at windows.

[mike tesko]

I'm not talking about rifles at windows.

Of course, not. That is because you know that the anshuzt rifle (photo' 23) was photographed resting against the bedroom window, before it was photographed on the body. Stop pretending you don't know the police positioned the rifle on Sheila's body from the bedroom window, and stop pretending you don't accept the rifle was moved from  the bedroom window, onto the body. You must surely know that what I am talking about, is true...

[Jane]

Of course, not. That is because you know that the anshuzt rifle (photo' 23) was photographed resting against the bedroom window, before it was photographed on the body. Stop pretending you don't know the police positioned the rifle on Sheila's body from the bedroom window, and stop pretending you don't accept the rifle was moved from  the bedroom window, onto the body. You must surely know that what I am talking about, is true...

Hell's bells!!!! That's a bit of a leap. isn't it?

[mike tesko]

Hell's bells!!!! That's a bit of a leap. isn't it?

No, it's not...

The facts speak for themselves, unless you are trying to suggest, that the rifle rifle was photographed on the body of Sheila was photographed on the body, before the rifle was photographed on the body of Sheila Caffell - now, what is you argument? Was the rifle photographed upon Sheila's body, before it  was photographed, against the bedroom  window, or vice versa?? We need to understand what your position is? You tell us, what your position is?

We will then be able to tell, what your true position, and belief is...

[Caroline]

Of course, not. That is because you know that the anshuzt rifle (photo' 23) was photographed resting against the bedroom window, before it was photographed on the body. Stop pretending you don't know the police positioned the rifle on Sheila's body from the bedroom window, and stop pretending you don't accept the rifle was moved from  the bedroom window, onto the body. You must surely know that what I am talking about, is true...

Ha, ha!! Nah! I don't know or believe any of that. Jeremy put the rifle on his sister after he shot her. He lied then and he's still lying now. 

[mike tesko]

Ha, ha!! Nah! I don't know or believe any of that. Jeremy put the rifle on his sister after he shot her. He lied then and he's still lying now.

I am sorry, but you are absolutely wrong...

Crime scene photograph No. 23, was definitely taken before Crime Scene Photographs, No's "5, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32. What benefit would there be in me lying about that fact?