Absolute tosh. The police had no reason to stage anything, that was all accomplished by Jeremy Bamber in a half-baked attempt to frame his 'deranged' sister.
You theories hold no water Mike, your claim that a policeman shot Sheila is utter nonsense so you concoct the police staged the rifle story in an attempt to give it some credence. I'm afraid none of it works and as Caroline pointed out, Jeremy Bamber is guilty.
Jeremy Bamber did not kill anybody, and you have already admitted police brought the rifle from the window and placed it on Sheila's body, and then took photographs which they used to fool the jury into believing that the photographs were a true record of how Sheila's body was found unmoved or untouched by any person, which we now know to have been a complete fabrication, as proven and established by the sequence with which key photographs were taken by SOCO. How anybody can suggest that Jeremy staged his sisters body to fool police into accepting she had shot herself beggars belief, in view of the fact that it can now be shown that police moved the body and the rifle so they could photograph her supposed death scene. The reason why miscarriages of justice happen is because of people like you. You are ignorant to the truth. Of course the police had a reason to cover what they had done up - they shot an unarmed deranged young woman downstairs in the kitchen which they called it 'a suicide', and later on, after the police surgeon, Dr Craig, had already pronounced her dead, they placed a loaded rifle which they brought to her body from the bedroom window, which discharged a live round depositing bullet PV/19 into her brain. There was nothing remotely legal about what happened in the main bedroom when they shot Sheila whilst carrying out a 'gauging exercise' using a loaded gun. The police shot and killed Sheila Caffell in the main bedroom, and the circumstances of how they killed her, were swept under the carpet, helped by them staging her death scene and then photographing her body with the gun upon it to give an impression that she had shot herself. The photographs they took after they had arranged the rifle back on her body were misused during the trial to support the contention that these particular photographs showed views of her death scene unmoved and untouched until Cook stepped forward and took the gun from her body. The police had every reason to cover up what they had done, and they did. How anybody can justify the police shooting and killing Sheila Caffell in these circumstances by claiming they would have been entitled to shoot her has got to be nuts. You cannot place a loaded weapon on the body of a victim whether or not you thought she was dead, or as it turned out deeply unconscious, and then start arranging her fingers upon and around the trigger mechanism, which causes the gun to go off, and then say, "oh, it's alright, we were entitled to kill her anyway". No, they weren't entitled to kill her anyway, she was unarmed, mistakenly thought to be dead, but only deeply unconscious. They had her under control, there was not justification for any police officer to claim after the gun went off, that "oh well, we were entitled to kill her anyway". There was no reason thereafter to stage her actual death scene to make it look like she had shot herself (when she hadn't). Even worse, for the police to then go on and take photographs which a year later they misused in a defiant act of deception. People like you who support this kind of dishonesty are a disgrace. The only time people like you will ever appreciate this type of injustice is if it happens and you are the victim on the receiving end of it...
