It never ceases to amaze me how some people ignore the evidence. What these people need to do is get the facts right. Firstly, PC David Bird, and DI Ron Cook, are low life criminals in uniform. It doesn't matter how many witness statements they made, or didn't make. It doesn't matter what they said when both testified during the trial. These two criminals in uniform are clearly exposed as wrongdoers by the sequence with which crime scene photographs were taken. Let me address the 'now known' facts, the truth of which was deliberately altered during the trial, to prevent the court, the defence, the jury and the general public from finding out the 'truth' about who shot Bambers sister, and who had in fact positioned the rifle on Bambers sisters body to make it look like she had taken her own life. The crime scene photograph No.'s, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, all show the anshuzt rifle upon Sheila Caffells body. Crime scene photograph No. 23, on the other hand, shows the same rifle resting against the window frame of the main bedroom. Now, during the trial the criminals Cook and Bird, deceived the court into believing that the 8 photographs which show the rifle upon Sheila Caffells body, had been taken before crime scene photograph No. 23 which shows the same rifle resting against the window frame in the same bedroom. Cook gave sworn testimony stating that the photograph (23) showing the rifle at the bedroom window, was taken after the other 8 photographs which showed 'that' rifle upon Sheila Caffells body. Cook swore on his oath that two of these photographs showed movement of Sheila's hand, which he said he was responsible for moving, because he said he wanted PC Bird to photograph bloodied fingermarks beneath it. Cook then went on to say that he had removed the rifle, handed it to PI Montgomery to check to see if it was still loaded, being handed it back, and then Cook himself placing the anshuzt rifle at the bedroom window, where he said PC Bird had subsequently taken photograph 23...
He lied...
PC Bird gave a detailed explanation ( during his own testimony at the trial) about what he says he had taken this collection of 9 crime scene photographs in. He produced a short witness statement on the day he gave his testimony, purporting to show the various locations he had taken photographs in at the scene that morning. This witness statement was just a prop to support the lies both Cook and himself had invented around the sequence with which this collection of 9 photographs had been taken in. Cook and Bird stated the sequence that these 9 crime scene photographs had been taken in was as follows; 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, followed by 23...
They both reiterated the fact that the body with the rifle upon it had been photographed before the rifle was subsequently photographed at the bedroom window. Cook the criminal had he said, removed it from the victims body and placed it at the bedroom window - he lied. PC Bird, well in addition to lying about the sequence with which he claimed to have taken these 9 key crime scene photographs in, when he was asked about photograph 23, and the rifle shown to be resting against the bedroom window, how did 'that' rifle get there, and who had placed it there? He responded by saying, "I do not know"...
