Author Topic: outlandish Theory's  (Read 71923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #180 on: November 17, 2015, 04:05:PM »

Lookout, I rather think, that between you, you and Adam have it covered ;) ^-^ ^-^ ^-^






I would have thought others already have it cut and dried------------in their own tin-pot way.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #181 on: November 17, 2015, 04:08:PM »





I would have thought others already have it cut and dried------------in their own tin-pot way.

But you're the one who comes up with all the outlandish theories to make him appear innocent. WE don't have to. We don't need any. He's already been found guilty

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #182 on: November 17, 2015, 04:18:PM »
But you're the one who comes up with all the outlandish theories to make him appear innocent. WE don't have to. We don't need any. He's already been found guilty






Exactly. Yours is by far the easiest option and needs no over-usage of thoughts on the subject. Because I don't believe in theories because they're dangerous,I'd rather say that I suggest rather than theorise.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #183 on: November 17, 2015, 04:22:PM »
If I thought like you,I'd just say guilty and be done with because I'd see no reason for continuing seeing as the man is in prison anyway. I don't understand your logic,if you can call it that. ??? ??? Why carry on discussing when there's no more to discuss ? Maybe it's me,but I don't get it.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #184 on: November 17, 2015, 04:23:PM »





Exactly. Yours is by far the easiest option and needs no over-usage of thoughts on the subject. Because I don't believe in theories because they're dangerous,I'd rather say that I suggest rather than theorise.

Oh right. OTHERS come out with ridiculous theories. You just make ridiculous suggestions ^-^ ^-^ ^-^

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #185 on: November 17, 2015, 04:24:PM »
Surely your questioning is beyond saturation ? Or is it that you're not 100% sure ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #186 on: November 17, 2015, 04:36:PM »
Surely your questioning is beyond saturation ? Or is it that you're not 100% sure ?

I know-----------------let's think of some really outlandish theories . It seems to come as second-nature to some.

Not when you throw out invitations like the above.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #187 on: November 17, 2015, 05:14:PM »
Surely your questioning is beyond saturation ? Or is it that you're not 100% sure ?

Oh not this old chestnut. Are you so insecure with the lack of people that support Bamber and believe him innocent that you have to accuse those of us who believe in his guilt of being unsure!  ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #188 on: November 17, 2015, 05:44:PM »
Oh not this old chestnut. Are you so insecure with the lack of people that support Bamber and believe him innocent that you have to accuse those of us who believe in his guilt of being unsure!  ;D







On the contrary there's nothing insecure about me. I'm as sure as I'll ever be that the man is innocent. As I've already pointed out it's easier to find him guilty !!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #189 on: November 17, 2015, 05:49:PM »






On the contrary there's nothing insecure about me. I'm as sure as I'll ever be that the man is innocent. As I've already pointed out it's easier to find him guilty !!

As far as I'm concerned, that's both a dangerous and arrogant place to be. I DO have doubts  -I'm not omnipotent-  and I'm glad. When I have them I just refer back to the information I have which convinces me of his guilt.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #190 on: November 17, 2015, 06:12:PM »
If I thought like you,I'd just say guilty and be done with because I'd see no reason for continuing seeing as the man is in prison anyway. I don't understand your logic,if you can call it that. ??? ??? Why carry on discussing when there's no more to discuss ? Maybe it's me,but I don't get it.

How can you debate a case when you have no opposition to argue against? I guess then you could say anything you liked whether true or not and there would be no one to tell you you're wrong. Oh well - if only this was Utopia!  ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #191 on: November 17, 2015, 06:17:PM »
As far as I'm concerned, that's both a dangerous and arrogant place to be. I DO have doubts  -I'm not omnipotent-  and I'm glad. When I have them I just refer back to the information I have which convinces me of his guilt.

I'm just dangerous and arrogant then!  ;) ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline wiggy

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 40
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #192 on: November 18, 2015, 12:43:AM »
The point of this thread was to try and stop outlandish theories and try and stick to what actualy was cold hard facts .

I dont think its worked lol

Here is a theory that is even more ridiculous and circumstantial.

David Boultflour  Finds out that the bambers own most of his land and are leasing it back he was previously unaware of this.  He thinks he and his family have been hard done by. He hates the Bambers June and her religious views piss him off and sheila and Jeremy are not blood and he thinks sheila is off her head and does not like Jeremy at all and his lifestyle and hate that he will inherit most of his land.

He knows about the kitchen window so on the night in question he uses it hes the one that murders them and try's to make it look like a staged suicide so that he can implicate Jeremy at a later stage.

He is the one that calls Jeremy  from the farm and says sheila gone mad he keeps the phrase short hoping that that Jeremy thinks its his dad then rings off.

He then goes home waits for the police to find the silencer that he has placed in the box to make the police think the suicide was staged . When they dont find it he then has to change plan and he says he finds it. Pointing the guilt to Jeremy.

This of course is not what happened but we need to stop guessing what happened and focus on actual evidence and facts .

Which the conclusion would be Jeremy probably did it but there is enough doubt to say the conviction unsafe

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #193 on: November 18, 2015, 09:52:AM »
The point of this thread was to try and stop outlandish theories and try and stick to what actualy was cold hard facts .

I dont think its worked lol

Here is a theory that is even more ridiculous and circumstantial.

David Boultflour  Finds out that the bambers own most of his land and are leasing it back he was previously unaware of this.  He thinks he and his family have been hard done by. He hates the Bambers June and her religious views piss him off and sheila and Jeremy are not blood and he thinks sheila is off her head and does not like Jeremy at all and his lifestyle and hate that he will inherit most of his land.

He knows about the kitchen window so on the night in question he uses it hes the one that murders them and try's to make it look like a staged suicide so that he can implicate Jeremy at a later stage.

He is the one that calls Jeremy  from the farm and says sheila gone mad he keeps the phrase short hoping that that Jeremy thinks its his dad then rings off.

He then goes home waits for the police to find the silencer that he has placed in the box to make the police think the suicide was staged . When they dont find it he then has to change plan and he says he finds it. Pointing the guilt to Jeremy.

This of course is not what happened but we need to stop guessing what happened and focus on actual evidence and facts .

Which the conclusion would be Jeremy probably did it but there is enough doubt to say the conviction unsafe


 Naughty!!! I think you've just made that up.

Offline wiggy

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 40
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #194 on: November 18, 2015, 10:47:AM »
thats the point without evidence you can make anything up