Author Topic: outlandish Theory's  (Read 71936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #150 on: November 16, 2015, 05:59:PM »
Recreational or a heavy user ? Or just a " taster " ? There is a difference,to the brain that is.


Generally speaking, journalists/authors couldn't care less. It isn't part of their remit, which is to sell copy and will do whatever it takes.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #151 on: November 16, 2015, 06:13:PM »

Generally speaking, journalists/authors couldn't care less. It isn't part of their remit, which is to sell copy and will do whatever it takes.





You're telling me. If people believed everything that was written then their mentality is questionable.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #152 on: November 16, 2015, 06:19:PM »




You're telling me. If people believed everything that was written then their mentality is questionable.

That's a strange thing to say, almost seems like a self assessment - since you're the one constantly in hot water on here for repeating things you've heard and then blaming blogs, books and the official site when they turn out not to be quite right.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #153 on: November 16, 2015, 06:24:PM »
That's a strange thing to say, almost seems like a self assessment - since you're the one constantly in hot water on here for repeating things you've heard and then blaming blogs, books and the official site when they turn out not to be quite right.





It doesn't mean that I believe it though.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #154 on: November 16, 2015, 06:26:PM »
What about yourself anyway ? You only repeat what others say or have said.I've never once seen anything constructive,in your OWN words,said by yourself yet.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #155 on: November 16, 2015, 06:27:PM »




It doesn't mean that I believe it though.

Why repeat t if you don't believe it or at least when it clear when you post?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #156 on: November 16, 2015, 06:28:PM »




It doesn't mean that I believe it though.


Do You mean your just playing Devil's advocate OR.............................you believe Jeremy's guilty?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #157 on: November 16, 2015, 06:29:PM »
I agree and it is when written about Jeremy.
There is more proof that Jeremy had the photos of Sheila and tried to sell them to the press, there are statements about that but supporters state how you shouldn't believe books/the press... funny how when it's to do with Sheila it is suddenly true. Just shows you how some don't care if something is true.

Colin is PROOF that Jeremy tried to sell those pictures of Sheila to The Sun.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #158 on: November 16, 2015, 06:33:PM »
What about yourself anyway ? You only repeat what others say or have said.I've never once seen anything constructive,in your OWN words,said by yourself yet.

That's because you don't read posts longer than 4 lines, Lookout.

I've been on here discussing the musical phones, the DNA and the blood in the silencer, Julie's evidence and my opinion on Jeremy's blogs longer than most people have been here.

It's ironic for you to say I just repeat what others say when that is what you find yourself continuously accused of, but then you add your own spin on it - so what you say is in a COLP report, a police statement, autopsy report or a book isn't quite in it as you claim it to be, because you've added your own spin - LookoutTheLiar.

Colin is PROOF that Jeremy tried to sell those pictures of Sheila to The Sun.

Yes, I agree 100%. But even without Colin, there is still MORE for the nude photo story than there is for the outlandish 40k drug debt.

Why repeat t if you don't believe it or at least when it clear when you post?

Anything that makes Jeremy sound good and Sheila sound bad is fair game. Doesn't have to be true.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #159 on: November 16, 2015, 06:36:PM »
That's because you don't read posts longer than 4 lines, Lookout.

I've been on here discussing the musical phones, the DNA and the blood in the silencer, Julie's evidence and my opinion on Jeremy's blogs longer than most people have been here.

It's ironic for you to say I just repeat what others say when that is what you find yourself continuously accused of, but then you add your own spin on it - so what you say is in a COLP report, a police statement, autopsy report or a book isn't quite in it as you claim it to be, because you've added your own spin - LookoutTheLiar.

Yes, I agree 100%. But even without Colin, there is still MORE for the nude photo story than there is for the outlandish 40k drug debt.

Anything that makes Jeremy sound good and Sheila sound bad is fair game. Doesn't have to be true.

Oh not the 40K thing again!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #160 on: November 16, 2015, 06:40:PM »
Oh not the 40K thing again!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Yes. Poor Sheila, without a penny to bless herself with, is allowed to rack up £40,000 of drug debt...................................according to CP. Wouldn't you just LOVE to know who told her.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #161 on: November 16, 2015, 06:43:PM »
Oh not the 40K thing again!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

With even more added to it that I've not heard before. Apparently Jeremy found a cheque stub in his mothers handbag proving that she has given Sheila £40,000.
So doesn't that mean it was paid???
(Not that I think it existed)
Now I have to wonder.

Who would be killed or rampaging over a 40k drug debt..........That had been paid.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #162 on: November 16, 2015, 06:46:PM »
With even more added to it that I've not heard before. Apparently Jeremy found a cheque stub in his mothers handbag proving that she has given Sheila £40,000.
So doesn't that mean it was paid???
(Not that I think it existed)
Now I have to wonder.

Who would be killed or rampaging over a 40k drug debt..........That had been paid.

So where is the stub? Not something you would throw away and also it would have been clear that 40K was deducted from June's account?

If the suggestion is that some drug baron was responsible - people need to remember the phone call which makes the killer either Jeremy or Sheila.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #163 on: November 16, 2015, 06:50:PM »
So where is the stub? Not something you would throw away and also it would have been clear that 40K was deducted from June's account?

If the suggestion is that some drug baron was responsible - people need to remember the phone call which makes the killer either Jeremy or Sheila.

I've not read Wilkes book and I guess that is the source - although I've heard the claim before but never with the stub part.

Lookout said if you want to know where the stub is, you need to find June's handbag. I am not sure where the handbag ended up.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #164 on: November 16, 2015, 06:53:PM »
So where is the stub? Not something you would throw away and also it would have been clear that 40K was deducted from June's account?

If the suggestion is that some drug baron was responsible - people need to remember the phone call which makes the killer either Jeremy or Sheila.

And even if Jeremy had been careless enough to "mislay" it, the banks -both Sheila's and June's would have had records. I mean, c'mon. It's mid 1980's. We're talking FORTY THOUSAND POUNDS not forty, four hundred, or even four thousand.