Author Topic: outlandish Theory's  (Read 71983 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #75 on: November 14, 2015, 12:14:PM »
the relatives wernt looking for silencer but they manged to find one.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #76 on: November 14, 2015, 12:19:PM »
They weren't looking for a silencer and had no reason to assume one was used.

But it was discussed by the relatives with the police allegedly the next day? so why did they not go back and look then? At least then the risk of contamination would be less.


Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44442
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #77 on: November 14, 2015, 12:30:PM »
But it was discussed by the relatives with the police allegedly the next day? so why did they not go back and look then? At least then the risk of contamination would be less.

Why would the relatives discuss a silencer the next day with the police ? Although they would know how quiet a silencer makes a rifle. Anyway Taff was refusing to entertain the murder theory. Have you got a source ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #78 on: November 14, 2015, 01:05:PM »
But it was discussed by the relatives with the police allegedly the next day? so why did they not go back and look then? At least then the risk of contamination would be less.

A silencer was mentioned on 9th, the family said they found it on 10th. I'm not sticking up for the silencer evidence because I don't believe it to be genuine.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #79 on: November 14, 2015, 02:14:PM »
Why would the relatives discuss a silencer the next day with the police ? Although they would know how quiet a silencer makes a rifle. Anyway Taff was refusing to entertain the murder theory. Have you got a source ?

Yes it was Anne who said she overheard Jeremy saying why the silencer was not on the gun.Dont forget her note cards

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #80 on: November 14, 2015, 02:22:PM »
Why would the relatives discuss a silencer the next day with the police ? Although they would know how quiet a silencer makes a rifle. Anyway Taff was refusing to entertain the murder theory. Have you got a source ?

They didn't it was two days later at the police station when AP mentioned that the last time he saw the rifle the silencer and sights were attached.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #81 on: November 14, 2015, 08:34:PM »
Let me get this right. You're saying that the only way in which you'll believe she told the truth is by doing something that you can rest assured she'll never do. Interesting. Can you tell us which part of her testimony you believe to be untruthful?

sorry jane only just catching up on threads.

i dont believe jb said to her he was going to have his family killed.

i suppose what i was saying was that, if she took a lie detector and was asked if she told the whole truth then i would believe her as i dont ghink she would be able to cheat it.

however, that isnt going to happen


Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #82 on: November 14, 2015, 08:35:PM »
How do you think they can force her to take such a test?

i dont think they can force her but she could be asked

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #83 on: November 14, 2015, 08:40:PM »
sorry jane only just catching up on threads.

i dont believe jb said to her he was going to have his family killed.

i suppose what i was saying was that, if she took a lie detector and was asked if she told the whole truth then i would believe her as i dont ghink she would be able to cheat it.

however, that isnt going to happen

It's actually a stress detector and as such, despite telling 100% of the truth, I'd fail because I'd be putting myself under enormous stress by taking the test.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #84 on: November 14, 2015, 08:43:PM »
It's actually a stress detector and as such, despite telling 100% of the truth, I'd fail because I'd be putting myself under enormous stress by taking the test.

That's why Jeremy passed it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #85 on: November 14, 2015, 08:57:PM »
It's actually a stress detector and as such, despite telling 100% of the truth, I'd fail because I'd be putting myself under enormous stress by taking the test.






This is why I was always diagnosed as having high blood-pressure when at the surgery,but I knew in my mind that it was because I was at the surgery and it was later classed as " white coat syndrome ".Neverthless I was given medication for high blood-pressure but didn't need it. ::)
The moral here is that I would also fail a detector test because of being prone to anxiety.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #86 on: November 14, 2015, 09:03:PM »





This is why I was always diagnosed as having high blood-pressure when at the surgery,but I knew in my mind that it was because I was at the surgery and it was later classed as " white coat syndrome ".Neverthless I was given medication for high blood-pressure but didn't need it. ::)
The moral here is that I would also fail a detector test because of being prone to anxiety.

Hi lookout

I have "white coat syndrome" and I would fail a lie detector as it has been said I am a very anxious person.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #87 on: November 14, 2015, 09:11:PM »
Hi lookout

I have "white coat syndrome" and I would fail a lie detector as it has been said I am a very anxious person.





Hi Susan,I'm so glad I'm not on my own. Horrible though isn't it ? Try as you might you can't help it. It's the result of hanging on to my emotions ( it's what I say anyway ) though I'm not a " nervy " type.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #88 on: November 14, 2015, 09:32:PM »
Hello wiggy. I personally am impressed by yiur pists as they seem to be based on what has been presented not what assumptions we all make on here.

i do hope you will continue posting.

i swing from guilty to innocent on a daily basis.

crazes me

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: outlandish Theory's
« Reply #89 on: November 14, 2015, 09:38:PM »
That's why Jeremy passed it.

I assume you are against them now being used for sex offenders ?