Author Topic: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??  (Read 10261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #30 on: October 30, 2015, 06:38:PM »
those times do not match up at all with julies original statement . So to pick and chose times to suit a scenario is pretty pointless .

Well, that's what Jeremy is doing to fit in a call from Nevill!

Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #31 on: October 30, 2015, 06:54:PM »
those times do not match up at all with julies original statement . So to pick and chose times to suit a scenario is pretty pointless .

You mean the statement she gave to help Jeremy that she gave before she spoke to her roommates to ask them what time he called since she didn't look at the clock herself?

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #32 on: October 30, 2015, 06:57:PM »
What im uncomfortable with is where it says ' got hold of one of my guns'

I realised you dan argue that point away but it doesnt feel right to me

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #33 on: October 30, 2015, 07:05:PM »
What im uncomfortable with is where it says ' got hold of one of my guns'

I realised you dan argue that point away but it doesnt feel right to me

West simply paraphrased what Jeremy told him - the evidence for this is the word 'Berserk'. West used the word to Bonnet instead of 'crazy' - how do we know that? because West used the word in his rolling log of events as they unfolded.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #34 on: October 30, 2015, 07:06:PM »
What im uncomfortable with is where it says ' got hold of one of my guns'

I realised you dan argue that point away but it doesnt feel right to me






" One of my guns " and not my rifle ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #35 on: October 30, 2015, 07:08:PM »





" One of my guns " and not my rifle ?

How is that relevant Lookout? The rifle was used to kill everyone!  ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #36 on: October 30, 2015, 07:09:PM »
There are eyes everywhere and walls have ears!  ;)

Totally!  ;D
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #37 on: October 30, 2015, 07:16:PM »
How is that relevant Lookout? The rifle was used to kill everyone!  ;D ;D ;D






If he'd said rifle he'd have meant the rifle. Because he only stipulated " gun " it could have been any one of them that Sheila was waving/threatening but not necessarily using,which we now know.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #38 on: October 30, 2015, 07:18:PM »





" One of my guns " and not my rifle ?

Guns being a generic?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #39 on: October 30, 2015, 07:19:PM »
Guns being a generic?







But I feel pretty sure that Neville would have been precise.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #40 on: October 30, 2015, 07:21:PM »






But I feel pretty sure that Neville would have been precise.

Yes, I'm quite certain that in a moment of panic he'd have been precise.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #41 on: October 30, 2015, 07:24:PM »





If he'd said rifle he'd have meant the rifle. Because he only stipulated " gun " it could have been any one of them that Sheila was waving/threatening but not necessarily using,which we now know.

And - not sure what your point is Lookout? West was paraphrasing but Jeremy also said gun - so?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #42 on: October 30, 2015, 07:40:PM »
And - not sure what your point is Lookout? West was paraphrasing but Jeremy also said gun - so?






It's as easy to say rifle as it is gun. It wouldn't have taken any more time.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #43 on: October 30, 2015, 07:43:PM »





It's as easy to say rifle as it is gun. It wouldn't have taken any more time.

OK, Jeremy said Nevill said 'gun', Jeremy repeated 'gun' to West, West said 'gun'.  Are you saying that Nevill should have said 'rifle'? If so I don't understand your point - basically you're arguing against Jeremy!  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13786
Re: Why Jeremy Took Nevill's call so SERIOUSLY??
« Reply #44 on: October 30, 2015, 07:57:PM »
West simply paraphrased what Jeremy told him - the evidence for this is the word 'Berserk'. West used the word to Bonnet instead of 'crazy' - how do we know that? because West used the word in his rolling log of events as they unfolded.

He is saying the two dogs are going bezerk