Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?

[lookout]

Your above does not apply to the OS.

I'd like to think that if it were a member of my family who had been wrongly accused,that such a fund would be set-up in order to pay for the investigative services of forensic experts etc. No legal aid.

The con in this respect are the extortionate charges made for these services. Can you answer why such services cost so much ?

[lookout]

Why not have a look at the breakdown of costs on the OS. They'll be lucky to see change from £10,000 for what their intentions are.

[Stephanie]

Your above does not apply to the OS.

I'd like to think that if it were a member of my family who had been wrongly accused,that such a fund would be set-up in order to pay for the investigative services of forensic experts etc. No legal aid.

The con in this respect are the extortionate charges made for these services. Can you answer why such services cost so much ?

This is your confirmation bias and one of the main reasons you won't accept reasonable argument from people who oppose your views. You have showed you are unable to be objective, instead preferring to dispute anything put in front of you with your personal experiences and because you think you know better.

[Stephanie]

Why not have a look at the breakdown of costs on the OS. They'll be lucky to see change from £10,000 for what their intentions are.

I agree with you - I've seen the breakdown of the costs Lookout and I've seen how they are covering their own costs firsts.

[lookout]

I agree with you - I've seen the breakdown of the costs Lookout and I've seen how they are covering their own costs firsts.

Do you know anyone who works for nothing ? Would you ?

[JackiePreece]

What's your thoughts on the costs Gemini?

Do you think Jeremy is grateful to all the people who donate

[Neil]

What's your thoughts on the costs Gemini?

Do you think Jeremy is grateful to all the people who donate

Hello Jackie,  I don't expect you to know how the current appeal is going, but in the past, do these sort of appeals for money raise substantial amounts?

[JackiePreece]

Hello Jackie,  I don't expect you to know how the current appeal is going, but in the past, do these sort of appeals for money raise substantial amounts?

I think there has been substantial amounts of money raised in the past from generous people who believe Jeremy is innocent

I believe strongly the CT should stand down because they appear to cause setbacks on a regular basis

They continually ignore advice given to them by legal experts

[Steve_uk]

The only ones with an agenda are those who say he's guilty. Busy beavering in the background to try and block the idea of another appeal. Will they succeed against the law like RWB did ? We'll see.

I don't think anyone wants to block Jeremy's access to the legal process.

[John]

The only ones with an agenda are those who say he's guilty. Busy beavering in the background to try and block the idea of another appeal. Will they succeed against the law like RWB did ? We'll see.

That's because the evidence taken at its highest dictates that he is guilty.  Not one single person including Jeremy Bamber himself have in the last 31 years provided a single piece of evidence which can cast doubt on that verdict.

[lookout]

That's because the evidence taken at its highest dictates that he is guilty.  Not one single person including Jeremy Bamber himself have in the last 31 years provided a single piece of evidence which can cast doubt on that verdict.

John,how can anyone produce evidence of their innocence when they were in bed and nobody believes a word they say,except for those WITH an agenda,because everyone else appeared to have done well considering there was little or no investigation done in spite of their protestations of JB's guilt.

[David1819]

I think there has been substantial amounts of money raised in the past from generous people who believe Jeremy is innocent

I believe strongly the CT should stand down because they appear to cause setbacks on a regular basis

They continually ignore advice given to them by legal experts

The setback team! 

[Stephanie]

The setback team! 

Do I detect double standards?

[John]

John,how can anyone produce evidence of their innocence when they were in bed and nobody believes a word they say,except for those WITH an agenda,because everyone else appeared to have done well considering there was little or no investigation done in spite of their protestations of JB's guilt.

But didn't Jerry tell Julie he hadn't been to bed?  Not the sort of thing one makes up eh?

[David1819]

Do I detect double standards?

I really don't know what you are detecting