Your posts are so long winded it is difficult to concentrate on them.
What about crimes in your country?
Oswald was stitched up in the JFK assassination, with no actual factual evidence.
Jeremy was stitched with no factual evidence,only from people from people who stood to gain.
There was a ton of factual evidence against Jeremy. You simply choose to ignore it and not believe it the same way looney JFK conspiracy theorists simply dismiss evidence. Dismissing evidence doesn't make it go away. You have to refute evidence to overcome it. Saying no evidence exists because you choose to ignore it or discount it ends up amounting to one lying. If you choose to discount evidence without being able to refute it then admit such don't lie and say there is no evidence.
Julie's testimony against Jeremy is evidence.
Evidence that the killing started in the bedroom where there was no phone and thus that Jeremy made up the distress call is evidence.
Evidence that Jeremy staged bullets in the kitchen to support his made up tale of leaving the gun and ammo out is evidence.
Evidence that Jeremy lied to police saying Sheila fired all weapons in the house and was trained to fire the murder weapon is evidence.
Evidence Jeremy lied about calling police first when in fact he called Julie first is evidence.
The failure of Jeremy to call 999 but instead to call Julie and eventually to look up station numbers is evidence that contradicts his claim of being worried after receiving a distress call.
A lack of evidence on Sheila's body and clothing that would have been present if in fact she had killed the victims and committed suicide is evidence.
Evidence proving it is impossible for Sheila to have killed herself but rather was murdered is evidence.
I can list more but this is sufficient to make my point.