Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.

[guest154]

And you believe that ?

I have no reason not to.

[maggie]

How would he know it was him if he met him? It was 30 years ago, he's going to have changed one hell of a lot. Also what would he get out of pretending to be BC? Did PH track BC down or was it the other way?

He tried to arrange a meeting with Brett through a friend of his but he didn't get in touch then few months later he was phoned by someone claiming to be Brett.
I agree with you he probably wouldn't recognise him as men tend to change more than women imo 
I was a little disappointed because I had hoped he had been able to speak with Brett but again there's a 'but' imo

[lookout]

How do you pay an anonymous person? 

Another easy get-out---------anonymous ! Yeah. A likely story.

[lookout]

I have no reason not to.

Fair enough,it's your prerogative to believe ALL you read.

[guest154]

Fair enough,it's your prerogative to believe ALL you read.

That's rich!! Spoken by a parrot herself!! 

If you had read the book, before commenting on it, it would be clear to you why I don't think a payment was received.
You don't send an anonymous letter- and then ask for payment for it.  PH clearly states no payment was made, the author in the letter says he wants nothing in return.

What do you make of Jeremy's nickname for the single, female supporters that he has, Lookout?

[lookout]

So PH lied or an author was duped.

PH is taking a risk. BC could sue or make a public statement. Which immediately rubbishes PH's book.

Where's the risk in telling lies about an anonymous person ?? Where's the risk in alleging what a dead man said ? Both can't speak for a start.
PH may even think that BC is dead too.

[Adam]

I'm being serious its possible, the phone call being allegedly from BC has no authenticity, and I am not being biased either.

Had BC allegedly rang not showing himself claiming Jeremy was innocent I would strongly suspect it would be a fanatical crazy supporter. Since BC allegedly rang claiming he was guilty I strongly suspect its someone who don't like Jeremy.

This is only because this communication has no authenticity, who was on the other side of that telephone? show me the proof! Its as dubious as Neville's alleged phone call to Jeremy

Thirty years on, the conspiracy against Jeremy continues.

PH either lied and never spoke to BC.

Or someone pretended to be BC and said harmful lies about Jeremy. Perhaps it was Julie with a false butch voice.

Either way BC could sue PH or publically rubbish the book.

[Caroline]

Fair enough,it's your prerogative to believe ALL you read.

If that's not a PRIME example of pots and kettles!! 

[Adam]

Was PH engaging with Bamber ? Or other close relatives ?

He could easily get information from Bamber that only BC or close friends know. Then ask BC a question to confirm it's him.

It's easy for PH to ensure people he interviews are the right people.

[lookout]

That's rich!! Spoken by a parrot herself!! 

If you had read the book, before commenting on it, it would be clear to you why I don't think a payment was received.
You don't send an anonymous letter- and then ask for payment for it.  PH clearly states no payment was made, the author in the letter says he wants nothing in return.

What do you make of Jeremy's nickname for the single, female supporters that he has, Lookout?

I don't need to read the book. I got a pretty good outline of what the author was about over that debacle in the newspaper.

I don't know of any nickname.

[Caroline]

Where's the risk in telling lies about an anonymous person ?? Where's the risk in alleging what a dead man said ? Both can't speak for a start.
PH may even think that PH is dead too.

I think he knows he's alive Lookout! 

[maggie]

Thirty years on, the conspiracy against Jeremy continues.

PH either lied and never spoke to BC.

Or someone pretended to be BC and said harmful lies about Jeremy.

Either way BC could sue PH or publically rubbish the book.

Not if he has died.  I don't know either way but its amazing how sure you are it was Brett because it proves your arguments.  If this |Brett had said he had never believed it was Jeremy and he is sure he's innocent you would be arguing against him. 

[lookout]

Not a particularly original title either considering there are about half a dozen books by different authors which have the title of Deviant.

[maggie]

I don't need to read the book. I got a pretty good outline of what the author was about over that debacle in the newspaper.

I don't know of any nickname.

I have to say I'm not surprised about the nicknames etc.  he has to amuse himself somehow, that doesn't make him guilty. Who cares 

[guest154]

I have to say I'm not surprised about the nicknames etc.  he has to amuse himself somehow, that doesn't make him guilty, it does make him human. Who cares 

Not a nice way to speak about the people who support him and help keep his name in the public eye though is it?
Doesn't make him guilty but it shows his character.