Author Topic: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.  (Read 57957 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #45 on: August 10, 2015, 10:25:PM »
Different imo

Yes the situations were different.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #46 on: August 10, 2015, 10:27:PM »
I wonder how much the " anonymous letter writer was paid  ?"

 Do dead men speak ? How easy is it to write what a dead man was to have allegedly said.Did PH interview " Taff "Jones's  wife ( if she herself is still alive ? )

If he spoke to,and interviewed the relatives,we ALL knew/know what their thoughts were/are,so nothing new,unless there were " add-ons " to stretch things a little and help fill the book.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #47 on: August 10, 2015, 10:28:PM »
i dont belive there was one this is the second time hes claimed this.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #48 on: August 10, 2015, 10:29:PM »
Who is going to pretend to be BC? Who has even heard of BC and obviously the guy must have known things only BC could know.

Anyone who knows a fair bit about the case can pretend to be BC. How can we verify what BC did or didn't know? the guy on the end of the line could say anything.

BC has effectively not said a word since trial, now a phone call out the blue? there is no proof of authenticity, I would have though at leased BC would invite PH to visit him somewhere.



Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #49 on: August 10, 2015, 10:33:PM »
 The fact that PH was an ex-cop/retired cop is enough for me. Strange---------but I don't trust him or anyone of his ilk.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #50 on: August 10, 2015, 10:33:PM »
Anyone who knows a fair bit about the case can pretend to be BC. How can we verify what BC did or didn't know? the guy on the end of the line could say anything.

BC has effectively not said a word since trial, now a phone call out the blue? there is no proof of authenticity, I would have though at leased BC would invite PH to visit him somewhere.
I agree it's not proven, am not convinced myself, he's always been so elusive. No one really knows if he's alive or dead.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #51 on: August 10, 2015, 10:35:PM »
I wonder how much the " anonymous letter writer was paid  ?"

 

He was paid nothing.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #52 on: August 10, 2015, 10:36:PM »
 They have a look about them too.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #53 on: August 10, 2015, 10:39:PM »
He was paid nothing.
No offence mat but do you know that as fact.?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #54 on: August 10, 2015, 10:41:PM »
Anyone who knows a fair bit about the case can pretend to be BC. How can we verify what BC did or didn't know? the guy on the end of the line could say anything.

BC has effectively not said a word since trial, now a phone call out the blue? there is no proof of authenticity, I would have though at leased BC would invite PH to visit him somewhere.

So PH lied or an author was duped.

PH is taking a risk. BC could sue or make a public statement. Which immediately rubbishes PH's book.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #55 on: August 10, 2015, 10:42:PM »
No offence mat but do you know that as fact.?

None taken. PH says so in the book, that no one he spoke to/received information from was paid. The letter clearly states that the author doesn't want anything from PH.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #56 on: August 10, 2015, 10:43:PM »
Anyone who knows a fair bit about the case can pretend to be BC. How can we verify what BC did or didn't know? the guy on the end of the line could say anything.

BC has effectively not said a word since trial, now a phone call out the blue? there is no proof of authenticity, I would have though at leased BC would invite PH to visit him somewhere.

How would he know it was him if he met him? It was 30 years ago, he's going to have changed one hell of a lot. Also what would he get out of pretending to be BC? Did PH track BC down or was it the other way?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #57 on: August 10, 2015, 10:44:PM »
I wonder how much the " anonymous letter writer was paid  ?"

 Do dead men speak ? How easy is it to write what a dead man was to have allegedly said.Did PH interview " Taff "Jones's  wife ( if she herself is still alive ? )

If he spoke to,and interviewed the relatives,we ALL knew/know what their thoughts were/are,so nothing new,unless there were " add-ons " to stretch things a little and help fill the book.

How do you pay an anonymous person?  ???
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #58 on: August 10, 2015, 10:51:PM »
He was paid nothing.






And you believe that ? ::)

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Deviant. Paul Harrison's book.
« Reply #59 on: August 10, 2015, 10:51:PM »
So PH lied or an author was duped.

PH is taking a risk. BC could sue or make a public statement. Which immediately rubbishes PH's book.

I'm being serious its possible, the phone call being allegedly from BC has no authenticity, and I am not being biased either.

Had BC allegedly rang not showing himself claiming Jeremy was innocent I would strongly suspect it would be a fanatical crazy supporter. Since BC allegedly rang claiming he was guilty I strongly suspect its someone who don't like Jeremy.

This is only because this communication has no authenticity, who was on the other side of that telephone? show me the proof! Its as dubious as Neville's alleged phone call to Jeremy