New video on the bike:

[Jane]

I'm not sure,but she didn't go while she was with Jeremy.

You may find it's YET another apocryphal story, Lookout.

[lookout]

You may find it's YET another apocryphal story, Lookout.

Looking at the OS site a while ago,it had said that JM had 5 criminal charges against her and the smuggling drugs from Canada was one of them.

[Jan]

Looking at the OS site a while ago,it had said that JM had 5 criminal charges against her and the smuggling drugs from Canada was one of them.

yes it was mentioned on an official document.

I am sure I saw that not just in a post.

[Adam]

I'm not sure,but she didn't go while she was with Jeremy.

Good source.

[Jane]

Looking at the OS site a while ago,it had said that JM had 5 criminal charges against her and the smuggling drugs from Canada was one of them.

The OS site. AH!!! She was teaching? With 5 criminal charges against her? She is now in a high position in education in CANADA, the place from where she is allegedly accused of smuggling drugs?!!!!!!!!!

[guest154]

The OS site. AH!!! She was teaching? With 5 criminal charges against her? She is now in a high position in education in CANADA, the place from where she is allegedly accused of smuggling drugs?!!!!!!!!!

Sounds plausible... right?

[Jane]

Sounds plausible... right?

Really, REALLY, Mat

[guest154]

Really, REALLY, Mat

No. 

[Jane]

No. 

Yeeeah

[Adam]

It really was a mistake using the bike. It has haunted him ever since.

He could have quite easily have walked at a brisk pace or jogged to and from WHF. It would just mean leaving his house half an hour earlier and getting back half an hour later. Which would still make it easy for him to create the desired effect. 

[Jan]

The OS site. AH!!! She was teaching? With 5 criminal charges against her? She is now in a high position in education in CANADA, the place from where she is allegedly accused of smuggling drugs?!!!!!!!!!

yes but she was not prosecuted or charged so nothing on her records . The letter from the DPP was on here once

[Jane]

yes but she was not prosecuted or charged so nothing on her records . The letter from the DPP was on here once

5 previous criminal charges are suss, whether or not she was prosecuted.

[Jan]

5 previous criminal charges are suss, whether or not she was prosecuted.

But she was not charged for anything though was she?

All charges were withdrawn so she had no need to declare anything when she emigrated - was she married by then?

[Jane]

But she was not charged for anything though was she?

All charges were withdrawn so she had no need to declare anything when she emigrated - was she married by then?

Yes Jan, I believe she was -I can almost see the church where she married from where I live- which would mean that there would be nothing to find against her in her new name.

[Caroline]

Yes Jan, I believe she was -I can almost see the church where she married from where I live- which would mean that there would be nothing to find against her in her new name.

Her wedding was reported and news travels fast. They would have known who she was - they do checks when emigrating and when taking a job as a teacher.