Author Topic: New radio interviews  (Read 20483 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #75 on: July 23, 2015, 08:35:PM »
Yes however if you accept that they were possibly both seriously damaged people because of their adoption and possibly later trauma from further abandonment such as being sent to boarding school etc. it doesn't seem any more improbable than Jeremy Bamber dashing across ploughed fields in the pitch black, climbing through windows etc. imo.  Actually, I found the letter quite plausible and I don't know why because in theory it is crazy.

I find it quite plausible that Jeremy told such to another prisoner. I don't find the story in the letter plausible though- the part about him taking away Sheila's evidence stained clothing in particular is not in the least bit credible. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #76 on: July 23, 2015, 08:36:PM »
If this is true about the Jack The Ripper book.... It's embaressing for PH...

"Yes, but Harrison researched the wrong Barnett. The book is largely ignored now."


I find it quite plausible that Jeremy told such to another prisoner. I don't find the story in the letter plausible though- the part about him taking away Sheila's evidence stained clothing in particular is not in the least bit credible. 

Agreed. I don't believe what Jeremy said will be true, but I do believe he may have said it.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #77 on: July 23, 2015, 08:40:PM »
I find it quite plausible that Jeremy told such to another prisoner. I don't find the story in the letter plausible though- the part about him taking away Sheila's evidence stained clothing in particular is not in the least bit credible.
I agree with that but the letter writer may have mixed that part up, I do agree and noticed that myself when I first read it that it makes no sense to remove the clothes when leaving them there would have completely got him off the hook.  I don't believe it's the whole truth but there may be something in it but chances are there isn't.  Keeping an open mind  :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #78 on: July 23, 2015, 08:43:PM »
cell mate confessions are dubious at the best of times anomalous one are beyond even that,

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33784
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #79 on: July 23, 2015, 08:53:PM »
I think there are several issues here.

A. Do we believe a letter was sent

B. Do we believe it's contents

C. Do we believe Jeremy made the confession

D Do we believe the author of the letter made up Jeremy's confession

E Do we think the whole thing is a publicity stunt

Apologies if this sounds like one of Adam's polls.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #80 on: July 23, 2015, 08:57:PM »
well the idea jeremy and sheila did it together as this seems to imply sounds ridiculous to me.

even more ridiculous is the idea that after lying to everybody for years he would suddenly disclose this to another prisoner.

But the idea that Jeremy is innocent and he was framed by EP, the relatives, Julie Mugford, the Sun Newspaper, the lab, the prosecution team, Julie's friends, his friends, the establishment, Babs Wilson ..... (please feel free to add to the list) makes perfect sense  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ::) ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #81 on: July 23, 2015, 09:08:PM »
But the idea that Jeremy is innocent and he was framed by EP, the relatives, Julie Mugford, the Sun Newspaper, the lab, the prosecution team, Julie's friends, his friends, the establishment, Babs Wilson ..... (please feel free to add to the list) makes perfect sense  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ::) ::)

well its one thats suported by a lot of experts in there field were as the other one is the teory of one auther allefedly backed an anoumous letter/

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #82 on: July 23, 2015, 09:09:PM »
well its one thats suported by a lot of experts in there field were as the other one is the teory of one auther allefedly backed an anoumous letter/

Paid 'experts' can say anything they like though, the COA and the CCRC cut through their gaffs.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #83 on: July 23, 2015, 09:15:PM »
they got no reason to lie its not like there short of work.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #84 on: July 23, 2015, 09:16:PM »
Yes however if you accept that they were possibly both seriously damaged people because of their adoption and possibly later trauma from further abandonment such as being sent to boarding school etc. it doesn't seem any more improbable than Jeremy Bamber dashing across ploughed fields in the pitch black, climbing through windows etc. imo.  Actually, I found the letter quite plausible and I don't know why because in theory it is crazy and doesn't even make sense.

Maggie what parts of the letter did you find plausible.? 

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #85 on: July 23, 2015, 09:21:PM »
doesnt anyone think its a bit funny that none of the other ever recive anomous letters.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #86 on: July 23, 2015, 09:23:PM »
they got no reason to lie its not like there short of work.

Didn't say they lie, but they are only giving their opinions. No guarantee that they are correct. They often have to rely on photographs because they were not there at the time.


doesnt anyone think its a bit funny that none of the other ever recive anomous letters.

With some of the people I've met just through this forum and the red forum when it comes to the Bamber case, I would not be shocked if PH recieved 1, 2 or 10 anonymous letters.  ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #87 on: July 23, 2015, 09:25:PM »
well its one thats suported by a lot of experts in there field were as the other one is the teory of one auther allefedly backed an anoumous letter/

What experts?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #88 on: July 23, 2015, 09:27:PM »
doesnt anyone think its a bit funny that none of the other ever recive anomous letters.

How do you know they didn't?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: New radio interviews
« Reply #89 on: July 23, 2015, 09:30:PM »
well i think if they had recived such anoumous letter they might of mentioned it but appwerantly who ever gets sent these letters.