0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yes however if you accept that they were possibly both seriously damaged people because of their adoption and possibly later trauma from further abandonment such as being sent to boarding school etc. it doesn't seem any more improbable than Jeremy Bamber dashing across ploughed fields in the pitch black, climbing through windows etc. imo. Actually, I found the letter quite plausible and I don't know why because in theory it is crazy.
I find it quite plausible that Jeremy told such to another prisoner. I don't find the story in the letter plausible though- the part about him taking away Sheila's evidence stained clothing in particular is not in the least bit credible.
well the idea jeremy and sheila did it together as this seems to imply sounds ridiculous to me.even more ridiculous is the idea that after lying to everybody for years he would suddenly disclose this to another prisoner.
But the idea that Jeremy is innocent and he was framed by EP, the relatives, Julie Mugford, the Sun Newspaper, the lab, the prosecution team, Julie's friends, his friends, the establishment, Babs Wilson ..... (please feel free to add to the list) makes perfect sense
well its one thats suported by a lot of experts in there field were as the other one is the teory of one auther allefedly backed an anoumous letter/
Yes however if you accept that they were possibly both seriously damaged people because of their adoption and possibly later trauma from further abandonment such as being sent to boarding school etc. it doesn't seem any more improbable than Jeremy Bamber dashing across ploughed fields in the pitch black, climbing through windows etc. imo. Actually, I found the letter quite plausible and I don't know why because in theory it is crazy and doesn't even make sense.
they got no reason to lie its not like there short of work.
doesnt anyone think its a bit funny that none of the other ever recive anomous letters.