Author Topic: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.  (Read 10955 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #165 on: June 15, 2015, 11:04:PM »
I don't go with that.... ;D

I do  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #166 on: June 15, 2015, 11:05:PM »
Naughty photos by the brother? I think not. But I can understand why you're trying to play it down.

Naughty photo being sold to the press disgusts me Mat...whether it be Bamber or any other person....

I am not playing it down, I do not believe anyone on this forum had seen such photos...neither did Fielder, nor Colin....yet here we are discussing that they were real....they might be, but they might not be. There is no concrete evidence they even existed, for all we have is a reporters says so.....Has he even got proof the talks took place? Where is the proof Mat?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #167 on: June 15, 2015, 11:05:PM »
No I don't agree with that at all!  :o
It's not a case of going to the papers with photos, it's going to the papers with dirty photos of your dead sister. There has to be something seriously wrong with you to do that.

Exactly Mat - and that's with or without sex aids!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #168 on: June 15, 2015, 11:08:PM »
He told Colin AND Fielder "You can see everything right down to the last detail" so they were explicit enough and Colin has never disputed the claim of sex aids so Jeremy may also have mentioned that to Colin, we don't know that he didn't. We're not just relying on the newspaper at all, we're relying on Colin - I don't think the 'sex aids' is the issue, Jeremy trying to sell them is.

Yes he may have, but there is no mention of sex aids to Colin.  Have you been to the library? We need to see the article to be honest....Will you pop?  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #169 on: June 15, 2015, 11:09:PM »
Naughty photo being sold to the press disgusts me Mat...whether it be Bamber or any other person....

I am not playing it down, I do not believe anyone on this forum had seen such photos...neither did Fielder, nor Colin....yet here we are discussing that they were real....they might be, but they might not be. There is no concrete evidence they even existed, for all we have is a reporters says so.....Has he even got proof the talks took place? Where is the proof Mat?

The disgusting part, is NOT whether the pictures existed or not, or if they include sex aids, Jeremy said they existed (with or without sex aids), and it is his INTENTION to sell them that is vile and beyond the pale. If he made them up, what kind of warped mind would do that? If they do exist, he obviously destroyed them when he was outed by Fielder.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #170 on: June 15, 2015, 11:11:PM »
Yes he may have, but there is no mention of sex aids to Colin.  Have you been to the library? We need to see the article to be honest....Will you pop;D ;D ;D ;D

Will I what?  :o :o :o ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #171 on: June 15, 2015, 11:23:PM »
Will I what?  :o :o :o ;D ;D ;D

Pop and have a gander... lol ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #172 on: June 15, 2015, 11:28:PM »
Pop and have a gander... lol ;D ;D ;D ;D

I can try - have some other ideas on how to get a  copy. Don't worry, it won't involve compromising myself!  :o :o :o ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #173 on: June 15, 2015, 11:41:PM »
I can try - have some other ideas on how to get a  copy. Don't worry, it won't involve compromising myself!  :o :o :o ;D ;D ;D ;D

Online? That can be costly...but when you weigh up the travel/parking plus time it might be more viable to order online....The problem with that is that you need to know the exact date the story was published....Its better if you looked on film at the library....Trouble is, it might not go to 1985/6. My local library only goes to the 1950's.....Kew is the answer.....so anyone living local can access.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

guest154

  • Guest
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #174 on: June 15, 2015, 11:44:PM »
Naughty photo being sold to the press disgusts me Mat...whether it be Bamber or any other person....

I am not playing it down, I do not believe anyone on this forum had seen such photos...neither did Fielder, nor Colin....yet here we are discussing that they were real....they might be, but they might not be. There is no concrete evidence they even existed, for all we have is a reporters says so.....Has he even got proof the talks took place? Where is the proof Mat?

Its talked about on the official site......But then again they do lie.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #175 on: June 16, 2015, 12:10:AM »
Online? That can be costly...but when you weigh up the travel/parking plus time it might be more viable to order online....The problem with that is that you need to know the exact date the story was published....Its better if you looked on film at the library....Trouble is, it might not go to 1985/6. My local library only goes to the 1950's.....Kew is the answer.....so anyone living local can access.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

I do.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #176 on: June 16, 2015, 12:16:AM »
I do.

Yeah off the top of my head it was the 17th....I might be wrong though... :-[ :-[ :-[

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44294
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #177 on: June 16, 2015, 04:28:AM »
The disgusting part, is NOT whether the pictures existed or not, or if they include sex aids, Jeremy said they existed (with or without sex aids), and it is his INTENTION to sell them that is vile and beyond the pale. If he made them up, what kind of warped mind would do that? If they do exist, he obviously destroyed them when he was outed by Fielder.

I can't see the point in Jeremy making up the pictures.

His aim was get a lot of extra money. Requesting a meeting, telling Fielder about the pictures, then never being able to provide them if Fielder shows an interest,  gets him zilch and wastes potential partying time. 

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #178 on: June 16, 2015, 10:33:AM »
I can't see the point in Jeremy making up the pictures.

His aim was get a lot of extra money. Requesting a meeting, telling Fielder about the pictures, then never being able to provide them if Fielder shows an interest,  gets him zilch and wastes potential partying time.

And makes him look like a pervert!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #179 on: June 16, 2015, 10:51:AM »
You spend your time trying to deflect from the issues.  The fact is that Boutflour called and told Colin to pay attention to the press because Jeremy was going to be arrested. It makes no difference whether Boutflour intended to call Colin and did so by accident or did so intentionally.   You tried to spin this as Colin being called about the Sun article but that is not the case you were wrong and had no basis for such a claim.  You are now dancing around for nothing.  You devote a great deal of nonsense to trying to defend Jeremy and fail to accomplish your mission you simply look like an inept apologist in the process.

you seem determined to deflect to shut down all disccusen about this subject i must be getting somwhere.