More denial - pathetic.
I don't think that your letters 25 or 30 years after the event have any relevance whatsoever. JB has denied it and quite frankly after your claims regarding the wallet question and the alleged non answering of that question, your interpretations are worthless.
How many questions have you asked JB? And how many has he answered?
Why would you think that he avoided rather than overlooked your question? You claim that he "does that with difficult questions", but the question isn't difficult. Nor was your previous one.
So how many questions did he avoid and how many did he answer?
Your ridiculous letters are not evidence of something that occurred 30+ years ago. They say more about you than JB.
I hadn't missed your claims, it's just that they have no credence given your previous.
So how many questions exactly has JB "avoided"? What leads you to believe that they were avoided rather than overlooked?
The last time that you claimed that he had avoided answering a question for two years, it turned out that he had in fact answered your question upon prompting by you after a few weeks. You however apparently lacked the basic comprehension skills, such as the ability to draw inferences, to understand this.
From the evidence that you presented my 12 and 13 year old grandchildren were able to infer that JB answered your wallet question when he gave you an answer of, "no, or I didn't", with the caveat that he didn't remember the "specific" question.
That you chose to ask the same insensitive question two years later despite your question having already being answered, at least to anyone with the comprehension skills of the average 12 year old, shows more about you than anything you imagine it reveals about JB.
