when exactly was the piece written and you are saying that Jeremy did not deny any of it at the time - Or he said he did approach the paper to sell the photos but the rest was lies?
The piece was written or at least published on the 17th September 1985, Jan.
Jeremy has said that he approached the paper to put his side of the story. This was because of the negative press that he was getting. It is unlikely in the extreme that he would attempt to sell pornographic pictures of his dead sister when the press and the Sun were already printing smear stories about him.
How convenient for Fielder and the Sun that Jeremy offered them porno pictures and how stupid would Jeremy have to be to imagine that reporters who had been smearing him would stop smearing him and instead buy some nude pictures of his dead sister off him.
It has no credibility or believability as a story and is almost certainly untrue.