Author Topic: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence  (Read 37332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #225 on: December 17, 2016, 09:59:PM »
It came from Jeremy!  ;)




Ooooh,he said the settle,because posters were asking what a settle was. Some people have never lived ::)  :)) :))

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #226 on: December 17, 2016, 10:00:PM »
..and he never blamed Nevill, never talked about it, was never curious, never speculated if you don't believe Julie's story, reluctant to visit the scene of the massacre, but so willing to make an appointment with Basil Cock.


EXACTLY Steve. Thank-you for understanding where I was coming from. We keep hearing how he believed Nevill was an old man on the point of giving up yet we're expected to believe Jeremy trusted/EXPECTED him to put away a weapon HE was responsible for. I find it hard that Jeremy is forgiven for not showing the slightest remorse. Surely, the most natural thing in the world, even if he HAD expected Nevill to put the gun away, would have been for him to have said how much he wished he'd done it himself.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #227 on: December 17, 2016, 10:03:PM »
..and he never blamed Nevill, never talked about it, was never curious, never speculated if you don't believe Julie's story, reluctant to visit the scene of the massacre, but so willing to make an appointment with Basil Cock.





Steve,if I'd had relatives like that,I'd have been hurtling to see Basil Cock too.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #228 on: December 17, 2016, 10:04:PM »



It was actually on the red forum where I first saw it and they're always right,aren't they ? It would certainly tie-in with my thoughts if that had been the case. I wonder !

Well my own mother did everything for bro. and me,even down to polishing our shoes for school and then as bro.got older and was in work,she carried on doing his washing,etc. My uniform was done at the hospital laundry so she didn't do that. It's surprising what some mothers did and still do,though to a lesser degree I imagine.

Jeremy didn't live at WHF. Mummies DON'T clean shoes for children who are in boarding school. It's doubtful that she ever did. There were girls employed to look after the children.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #229 on: December 17, 2016, 10:11:PM »
Jeremy didn't live at WHF. Mummies DON'T clean shoes for children who are in boarding school. It's doubtful that she ever did. There were girls employed to look after the children.




Oh I'd say that June made up for their absences once they returned home. It would have appeared that the rolling pin,etc did overtime with all the baking too,so she'd never have got out of the habit of making sure they were well cared for. Pity Sheila let her down-----but that's life. 

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #230 on: December 17, 2016, 10:13:PM »



Ooooh,he said the settle,because posters were asking what a settle was. Some people have never lived ::)  :)) :))

He said the table first.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #231 on: December 17, 2016, 10:16:PM »
He said the table first.





Maybe because if he'd said " settle " he'd have been looked at in a funny way,purely out of ignorance.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #232 on: December 17, 2016, 10:19:PM »



Oh I'd say that June made up for their absences once they returned home. It would have appeared that the rolling pin,etc did overtime with all the baking too,so she'd never have got out of the habit of making sure they were well cared for. Pity Sheila let her down-----but that's life.

Sheila didn't live there either..................and I VERY much doubt she did much in the way of cake eating when she visited.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #233 on: December 17, 2016, 10:22:PM »




Maybe because if he'd said " settle " he'd have been looked at in a funny way,purely out of ignorance.


Again Lookout, you've moved the discussion away from the point that Jeremy showed no remorse for leaving out a gun within sight of his mentally ill sister.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #234 on: December 17, 2016, 10:24:PM »
Sheila didn't live there either..................and I VERY much doubt she did much in the way of cake eating when she visited.




Or cooking either,or much else for that matter.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #235 on: December 17, 2016, 10:25:PM »




Maybe because if he'd said " settle " he'd have been looked at in a funny way,purely out of ignorance.

Actually, it was the ammunition which he said he had left on the table. He didn't actually say he left the rifle on the settle, it was the magazine, he said he left the rifle propped up against a wall, Odd thing though according to PC Dermott, Jeremy said he had gone out to try and shoot the rabbits at 10pm - yet another time discrepancy!

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1624.0;attach=7668
« Last Edit: December 17, 2016, 10:25:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #236 on: December 17, 2016, 10:30:PM »

Again Lookout, you've moved the discussion away from the point that Jeremy showed no remorse for leaving out a gun within sight of his mentally ill sister.




Because like most thoughtless 24 year olds,all he probably thought about was getting home and whatever was left behind,his dad would see to it.
Do we know whether his dad DID put the gun away ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #237 on: December 17, 2016, 10:32:PM »
Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive..

Indeed so, Steve......................although SOME would have us believe that (all?) the errors he made were due to his overwhelming shock and grief.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #238 on: December 17, 2016, 10:34:PM »
Actually, it was the ammunition which he said he had left on the table. He didn't actually say he left the rifle on the settle, it was the magazine, he said he left the rifle propped up against a wall, Odd thing though according to PC Dermott, Jeremy said he had gone out to try and shoot the rabbits at 10pm - yet another time discrepancy!

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1624.0;attach=7668





I think JB's quite entitled to make one or two faux-pa's considering there were plenty from the others.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #239 on: December 17, 2016, 10:37:PM »



Because like most thoughtless 24 year olds,all he probably thought about was getting home and whatever was left behind,his dad would see to it.
Do we know whether his dad DID put the gun away ?

Nonetheless, Lookout, which ever way we choose to see it, Jeremy was responsible for leaving out the gun he'd been using and it was used to kill 5 people. There are those amongst us who would wish, for ever more, that we'd put the gun away. Jeremy has said nothing.