Familiar Portrait?

[Caroline]

No,to be perfectly honest,I can't understand the big deal. I'd have been incensed if he had sold them,but he DIDN'T. There's one heck of a difference,as NO damage has been done and nobody is any the wiser.
What about the intimate pics that were first published about the deceased ?? Doesn't anyone find that objectionable,or is it only me ?

I have no idea what you're referring to.

[Jane]

No,to be perfectly honest,I can't understand the big deal. I'd have been incensed if he had sold them,but he DIDN'T. There's one heck of a difference,as NO damage has been done and nobody is any the wiser.
What about the intimate pics that were first published about the deceased ?? Doesn't anyone find that objectionable,or is it only me ?

I cannot believe that whilst you're slating Colin for taking the -PRIVATE- pictures you have no problem with Jeremy trying to sell them into the public domain.

[susan]

Lookout it would seem that the photo's that Colin took were in Sheila's flat and Jeremy said June removed them when Sheila was in hospital and put them in her bureau at WHF if this was the case I am asking myself why did June keep them and not throw them in the Aga I would have thought she would have been terrified of Ralph or the twins finding them.  We will never know the answer. I got the impression from the book that Colin removed them and the test photo's and destroyed them the famous ones as Jeremy called them were taken by him before Colin arrived at the flat.  After reading the book again it seems this was likely.

[lookout]

I have no idea what you're referring to.

When publications first went out,it showed  the bodies of June and Neville,as we see them on here.I believe Jeremy showed his objections to the press for having been insensitive.

[Alias]

Can I? But I already did.

So we are all waiting for the answer with baited breaths! 

[Jane]

When publications first went out,it showed  the bodies of June and Neville,as we see them on here.I believe Jeremy showed his objections to the press for having been insensitive.

Strange how the thought of all that potential money in his pocket for flogging porny pics altered his mind set. HowEVER hard you may try lookout, there is NO way to make acceptable what he did.

[Caroline]

When publications first went out,it showed  the bodies of June and Neville,as we see them on here.I believe Jeremy showed his objections to the press for having been insensitive.

Well, then he's a bigger hypocrite than I first thought. Complains about pictures of his murdered family, then tries to sell compromising pictures of his sister - he was probably more interested in trying to get a payout from the newspaper than he was about any respect for his family.

[Caroline]

So we are all waiting for the answer with baited breaths! 

Well given as it was one of the first questions I ever asked him, I would recommend you don't hold your breath because as usual, with a difficult question - he doesn't answer! And breathe 

[lookout]

Strange how the thought of all that potential money in his pocket for flogging porny pics altered his mind set. HowEVER hard you may try lookout, there is NO way to make acceptable what he did.

If anyone else had thought the matter seriously enough,it would have gone down in someone's notebook as another" blot in his copybook" along with the other fabricated/colluded evidence.

[Caroline]

If anyone else had thought the matter seriously enough,it would have gone down in someone's notebook as another" blot in his copybook" along with the other fabricated/colluded evidence.

It wasn't fabricated - he did it, which would seem to be fine by you.

[Jane]

If anyone else had thought the matter seriously enough,it would have gone down in someone's notebook as another" blot in his copybook" along with the other fabricated/colluded evidence.

Why? It was a murder case, not a pornography case.

[lookout]

Why? It was a murder case, not a pornography case.

They seemed to have listed everything else via the eyes and ears of RWB. Funny how he didn't press for that as a criminal offence along with the " homosexual activities " JB was alleged to be having with BC.
Collecting pornographic pictures of his sister would have been right up RWB's street to add to the other flimsy" evidence" he'd collected.

[Alias]

Well given as it was one of the first questions I ever asked him, I would recommend you don't hold your breath because as usual, with a difficult question - he doesn't answer! And breathe 

Did you start writing to him before or after you thought he was guilty?

[Caroline]

Did you start writing to him before or after you thought he was guilty?

I didn't 'start' writing to him, he wrote to me after I simply wished him well. However, if it's anyone's business, it was before. You think because I asked about the pictures it must mean I thought he was guilty? Well if so, your detective work is way off! We were discussing the photographs on her at the time, so I asked him. Least have have the courage to ask him relevant case related questions instead of blowing smoke like he's a celebrity.

[Jane]

They seemed to have listed everything else via the eyes and ears of RWB. Funny how he didn't press for that as a criminal offence along with the " homosexual activities " JB was alleged to be having with BC.
Collecting pornographic pictures of his sister would have been right up RWB's street to add to the other flimsy" evidence" he'd collected.

Lookout, are you truly missing the point here or simply trying to deflect from it? If this had come up, as it has now, when I believed Jeremy was innocent, the very least I could have said was that it wasn't one of his finest moments.  I would NOT have been trying to blame others for making it possible for the pictures to exist.