Author Topic: Familiar Portrait?  (Read 19097 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Familiar Portrait?
« on: May 19, 2015, 03:01:AM »
Involved in petty thievery, he seemed to lack discipline, used his charm to get away with not working too hard.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2015, 03:02:AM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2015, 09:46:AM »
Says a lot about society today.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2015, 10:51:AM »
Involved in petty thievery, he seemed to lack discipline, used his charm to get away with not working too hard.

Jeremy worked as a waiter in little chef on the A12, Not exactly typical of a grandiose psychopath

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2015, 11:20:AM »
Jeremy worked as a waiter in little chef on the A12, Not exactly typical of a grandiose psychopath



It's all relative. My friends 3 children were all sent there to work during the (public) school holidays. They lived near enough to walk. Unless someone took him, Jeremy would undoubtedly have had to have driven there. His background and education would certainly have made it possible to act in grandiose manner with many of his fellow employees.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2015, 11:37:AM »


It's all relative. My friends 3 children were all sent there to work during the (public) school holidays. They lived near enough to walk. Unless someone took him, Jeremy would undoubtedly have had to have driven there. His background and education would certainly have made it possible to act in grandiose manner with many of his fellow employees.
Do we have any proof that he acted in such a manner at the Little Chef, April? 

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2015, 11:51:AM »
 Oh,I bet he breathed a sigh of relief and was able to " be himself " for once among ordinary people at the Little Chef. It was enough at the time to show him that there was indeed another side to the life he'd been used to under the starchy conditions at WHF. His first taste of freedom.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2015, 11:53:AM »
His mother was the creator of the " Jekyll and Hyde " syndrome,if there is such a thing. Neither children were ever allowed to be themselves.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2015, 12:10:PM »
Oh,I bet he breathed a sigh of relief and was able to " be himself " for once among ordinary people at the Little Chef. It was enough at the time to show him that there was indeed another side to the life he'd been used to under the starchy conditions at WHF. His first taste of freedom.



It could also have given him the opportunity to feel -perhaps for the first time since leaving Greshams- at the top of the pecking order.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2015, 12:12:PM »
Do we have any proof that he acted in such a manner at the Little Chef, April?


With such a transient workforce it's doubtful that any were asked, or, indeed that it was necessary.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2015, 12:17:PM »


It could also have given him the opportunity to feel -perhaps for the first time since leaving Greshams- at the top of the pecking order.





Initially,he'd have hung on to that arrogant air that surrounded him,and we all know that it re-appeared when he was questioned by the police. I would say that a lot of public school educated people are like this to the point of appearing unapproachable. Sadly,common sense doesn't prevail always.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2015, 12:17:PM »

With such a transient workforce it's doubtful that any were asked, or, indeed that it was necessary.
Well of course but without proof he behaved in a grandiose manner, surely all we have is supposition?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2015, 12:19:PM »
 Grandiose doesn't fit in with Little Chef. ;D ;D ;D ;D He'd have been " one of the lads ".

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2015, 12:20:PM »
His mother was the creator of the " Jekyll and Hyde " syndrome,if there is such a thing. Neither children were ever allowed to be themselves.


I think you paint a very cruel picture of the person you believe June to have been. NONE of my own acquaintance, who knew her, would recognize the character you present her as having been. If she was hard on her children, I think it would have been because she felt it was expected of her to raise them in a way best befitting, and thus reflecting, the life they'd been adopted into.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2015, 12:23:PM »

I think you paint a very cruel picture of the person you believe June to have been. NONE of my own acquaintance, who knew her, would recognize the character you present her as having been. If she was hard on her children, I think it would have been because she felt it was expected of her to raise them in a way best befitting, and thus reflecting, the life they'd been adopted into.





A bit of a contradiction in terms---- " cruel picture " and " it was expected of her ".

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2015, 12:24:PM »
Grandiose doesn't fit in with Little Chef. ;D ;D ;D ;D He'd have been " one of the lads ".


The very last thing which Jeremy appears to have wanted to be seen as was "one of the lads". Top of the tree of Hooray Henrys might have suited better.