Author Topic: Familiar Portrait?  (Read 19107 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #225 on: May 21, 2015, 10:00:PM »




Asked how they ended up in June's bureau---------she was probably snooping when Bambs was in hospital.

Yep, again Jeremy happy to sully his dead mother's name. Hardly the actions of a grieving son.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #226 on: May 21, 2015, 10:02:PM »




In future Mat,put brain in gear before opening gob.

Well, it would help Lookout if you put the source of your information in future. There would be no misunderstandings or confusion.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #227 on: May 21, 2015, 10:06:PM »
Well, it would help Lookout if you put the source of your information in future. There would be no misunderstandings or confusion.

Thanks!  ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #228 on: May 21, 2015, 10:12:PM »
Yep, again Jeremy happy to sully his dead mother's name. Hardly the actions of a grieving son.





It was COLIN who said that,not Jeremy. ::)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #229 on: May 21, 2015, 10:18:PM »
Well, it would help Lookout if you put the source of your information in future. There would be no misunderstandings or confusion.






It makes no bloody difference.A couple of years ago I'd stressed that it was in CP's book that Sheila had been a" demented creature",and nobody took any notice.They all preferred to continue lambasting me for using the word creature as if it had come from me. ::) ::) I make a good punch-bag you see  for blue and red alike..

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #230 on: May 21, 2015, 10:40:PM »




It was COLIN who said that,not Jeremy. ::)

No it wasn't - Jeremy TOLD him June took the pictures to so she could control Sheila.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #231 on: May 21, 2015, 10:41:PM »





It makes no bloody difference.A couple of years ago I'd stressed that it was in CP's book that Sheila had been a" demented creature",and nobody took any notice.They all preferred to continue lambasting me for using the word creature as if it had come from me. ::) ::) I make a good punch-bag you see  for blue and red alike..

It makes a difference to me.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #232 on: May 22, 2015, 11:15:AM »
No it wasn't - Jeremy TOLD him June took the pictures to so she could control Sheila.






I really don't know where your info comes from,because in CC's book it DOESN'T mention control at all.
What it does say that Jeremy had added,was,quote " that she,June,could bring them out if she ever wanted to SHAME Sheila or use them to make her toe the line in future,unquote " Not CONTROL !!

Pages 93 AND 94 IN CC's book.

 

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #233 on: May 22, 2015, 12:38:PM »





I really don't know where your info comes from,because in CC's book it DOESN'T mention control at all.
What it does say that Jeremy had added,was,quote " that she,June,could bring them out if she ever wanted to SHAME Sheila or use them to make her toe the line in future,unquote " Not CONTROL !!

Pages 93 AND 94 IN CC's book.

I'm not arguing semantics, the fact is that Jeremy implied to Colin that his mother and father kept the pictures (and other things in the safe), to get people to do what they wanted. The fact that they had died in terrible circumstances seems lost on Jeremy - but it would be, given that he was responsible. He then went ahead and try to sell pictures of his murdered sister. I am honestly shocked that people can't see just how despicable and callous a person has to be to act this way!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #234 on: May 22, 2015, 12:53:PM »
I'm not arguing semantics, the fact is that Jeremy implied to Colin that his mother and father kept the pictures (and other things in the safe), to get people to do what they wanted. The fact that they had died in terrible circumstances seems lost on Jeremy - but it would be, given that he was responsible. He then went ahead and try to sell pictures of his murdered sister. I am honestly shocked that people can't see just how despicable and callous a person has to be to act this way!

Caroline
I agree it was the lowest of the low and why would Colin make it up and the newspaper printed that he had offered the pictures to them how could he do that is beyond me :(

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #235 on: May 22, 2015, 01:01:PM »
I'm not arguing semantics, the fact is that Jeremy implied to Colin that his mother and father kept the pictures (and other things in the safe), to get people to do what they wanted. The fact that they had died in terrible circumstances seems lost on Jeremy - but it would be, given that he was responsible. He then went ahead and try to sell pictures of his murdered sister. I am honestly shocked that people can't see just how despicable and callous a person has to be to act this way!






The same as I am shocked at the despicable acts of callousness that are carried out on the living.
Child abuse which goes unreported,and the latest young rape victim who was arrested and blamed for the crime of a monster.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #236 on: May 22, 2015, 03:04:PM »





The same as I am shocked at the despicable acts of callousness that are carried out on the living.
Child abuse which goes unreported,and the latest young rape victim who was arrested and blamed for the crime of a monster.

Thn you should JUST as disgusted by Jeremy!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #237 on: May 22, 2015, 05:28:PM »

I really don't know where your info comes from,because in CC's book it DOESN'T mention control at all.
What it does say that Jeremy had added,was,quote " that she,June,could bring them out if she ever wanted to SHAME Sheila or use them to make her toe the line in future,unquote " Not CONTROL !!

Pages 93 AND 94 IN CC's book.

You seem to always be citing books that support Jeremy's guilt... Very Strange  ::)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #238 on: May 22, 2015, 05:33:PM »
You seem to always be citing books that support Jeremy's guilt... Very Strange  ::)






Because those same books have a habit of running everyone else down apart from Jeremy. Very Strange Indeed.!!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #239 on: May 22, 2015, 06:05:PM »
Caroline
I agree it was the lowest of the low and why would Colin make it up and the newspaper printed that he had offered the pictures to them how could he do that is beyond me :(






I personally thought it was disgusting that CC would take nude pics of Sheila in the fields where people were working and the grounds of WHF to boot. Knowing full well that Sheila had once been caught by her mother in the same field.That was courting trouble, besides the man having little or no respect for his wife.  No wonder June must have been furious when she saw them. I would have been,too.
What a horrible thing to do. What did he intend doing with them,do we know ?