Author Topic: Familiar Portrait?  (Read 19130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #120 on: May 20, 2015, 12:53:PM »
Do we know how much cannabis was in the safe ? Nope.
Do we know why,in God's name it was there anyway ? Nope.
Do we know who knew it was there ? Nope.
Do we know where it ended up ? Nope.
Do we know if it was included in the list of items from the farmhouse ? Nope.
Do we know if EP questioned its existence ? Nope.
Do we know if Sheila had demanded any cannabis and had been refused ? Nope.

Hi lookout

Colin said it was taken from somebody staying at the farm by Ralph (think it was the guy from France) Jeremy laughed at his Father's actions as it was just a small cube he told Colin about it not sure what happened to it.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #121 on: May 20, 2015, 12:55:PM »
Do we know how much cannabis was in the safe ? Nope.
Do we know why,in God's name it was there anyway ? Nope.
Do we know who knew it was there ? Nope.
Do we know where it ended up ? Nope.
Do we know if it was included in the list of items from the farmhouse ? Nope.
Do we know if EP questioned its existence ? Nope.
Do we know if Sheila had demanded any cannabis and had been refused ? Nope.

Jeremy knew it was there but the suggestion that Sheila killed the family because she wanted a joint is really 'out there' Lookout. Cannabis isn't like heroin, it's not a craving you need to fulfil at all costs.  ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #122 on: May 20, 2015, 12:58:PM »
Not that Colin´s word is the godspel, but he happes to think that Jeremy did not kill for the inheritance, but rather out of frustration with - guess who..... June.

It seems to me that there was so much overkill that I can see where he is coming from. An angry person did this, in my opinion.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #123 on: May 20, 2015, 12:58:PM »
More than enough has been said about Jeremy and his drugs,even JM for that matter,but NOTHING has ever been said about it being in the safe at the farmhouse,or who it belonged to. Strange,that.

If 'nothing' had been said about it, how do we know about it?  ;D ;D ;D

Truth is, plenty has been said about it but as it's nothing to do with the murders, why do you imagine more should be said? The fact that it was still there should tell you it played no part. It was a piece of cannabis resin that Sheila didn't even know existed.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #124 on: May 20, 2015, 01:00:PM »
Not that Colin´s word is the godspel, but he happes to think that Jeremy did not kill for the inheritance, but rather out of frustration with - guess who..... June.

It seems to me that there was so much overkill that I can see where he is coming from. An angry person did this, in my opinion.

I agree about the anger but that doesn't mean the motive wasn't the inheritance.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #125 on: May 20, 2015, 01:02:PM »
Jeremy knew it was there but the suggestion that Sheila killed the family because she wanted a joint is really 'out there' Lookout. Cannabis isn't like heroin, it's not a craving you need to fulfil at all costs.  ;D ;D ;D





During the last 12 months of Sheila's life,she'd relied heavily on cannabis and as a consequence,smoked heavily too. Remember,there was only a trace in her bloodstream which meant that her last smoke would have been days before she arrived at WHF.
Because of her reliance on the drug,she would STILL have suffered withdrawal symptoms as I'd mentioned.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #126 on: May 20, 2015, 01:04:PM »
Hi lookout

Colin said it was taken from somebody staying at the farm by Ralph (think it was the guy from France) Jeremy laughed at his Father's actions as it was just a small cube he told Colin about it not sure what happened to it.




Hi Susan,this is what we're told. ;) To keep us quiet. ;D ;D ;D

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #127 on: May 20, 2015, 01:05:PM »
I agree about the anger but that doesn't mean the motive wasn't the inheritance.

But the anger aspect does not quite mesh with the year long planning.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #128 on: May 20, 2015, 01:05:PM »




During the last 12 months of Sheila's life,she'd relied heavily on cannabis and as a consequence,smoked heavily too. Remember,there was only a trace in her bloodstream which meant that her last smoke would have been days before she arrived at WHF.
Because of her reliance on the drug,she would STILL have suffered withdrawal symptoms as I'd mentioned.

Clearly, you know nothing about cannabis Lookout, it doesn't work like that.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #129 on: May 20, 2015, 01:06:PM »
I agree about the anger but that doesn't mean the motive wasn't the inheritance.





No way did it have anything to do with inheritance. The only one full of anger and frustration was Sheila.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #130 on: May 20, 2015, 01:07:PM »
But the anger aspect does not quite mesh with the year long planning.

Maybe not to you but it certainly does to me. When it came down to the actual murder, the anger came out - nothing strange about that.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #131 on: May 20, 2015, 01:09:PM »




No way did it have anything to do with inheritance. The only one full of anger and frustration was Sheila.

That's just your opinion but not one shared by the court or the majority.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #132 on: May 20, 2015, 01:10:PM »



Hi Susan,this is what we're told. ;) To keep us quiet. ;D ;D ;D

Quiet about what? That the whole thing happened because Sheila didn't have a joint?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #133 on: May 20, 2015, 01:11:PM »
Maybe not to you but it certainly does to me. When it came down to the actual murder, the anger came out - nothing strange about that.

But he is supposed to have thought of so many things, little details, down to moving telephones, staging a suicide with the Bible, making Sheila´s bed and on and on - while boiling with anger.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2015, 01:12:PM by Alias »

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #134 on: May 20, 2015, 01:19:PM »
But he is supposed to have thought of so many things, little details, down to moving telephones, staging a suicide with the Bible, making Sheila´s bed and on and on - while boiling with anger.

Not wanting to get caught doesn't mean he wasn't angry.