A paradox - with rifle at bedroom window, one bullet case too many linked to She

[mike tesko]

At 7.15am,  the anshuzt rifle was seen to be leaning against the bedroom window - if we are to believe that Sheila was already dead on the bedroom floor at this stage, how did the rifle end up at the window several feet from where her body was eventually photographed? Surely, if Sheila had already been dead at this time, the police could not have been fooled into thinking that she had committed suicide, since how did the rifle which had fired two bullets into her throat manage to manifest itself against the window? With the rifle against the window, at least one of the two bullet wounds which eventually ended up present in her neck could not yet have been inflicted, otherwise it was always going to be a case of five murders, and would never ever be considered to have been a case of four murders and a suicide. If the scene had been thus set, why would the police have any need to plant the rifle on top of her body at all?

Think...

With the rifle at the window, and Sheila's body on the bedroom floor at the same time, she could not possibly have committed suicide, and if she had already been shot twice, it would have been an open and shut case that she had been murdered...

[mike tesko]

A paradox...

[mike tesko]

The very fact that police treated her death as a suicide in these circumstances, have consequences beyond a cover up. The fact that this paradox exists, is because what the police and the prosecuting authorities have had us believe, cannot in fact be true. With the rifle that fired the fatal bullet beneath Sheila's chin leaning against the bedroom window, how could she have killed herself, how could that second shot have already been fired? How could there be two bullet cases on the bedroom floor next to her body, if she had not yet been shot at all by 7.15am?

[mike tesko]

The truth of the matter, can be found in two simple events enacted by PC Bird, who in the course of his duty took a series of crime scene photographs, showing the rifle leaning against the bedroom window at 10.25am, and the very first photograph of that very same rifle upon her body at 11.10am. Once you know these basic facts, it becomes possible to see exactly why the police staged the bedroom scene and proceeded upon the footing that Sheila had taken her own life, but the truth was / is, that she could not have done...

[mike tesko]

Introduction of the sound moderator into the shootings at the behest of the relatives, quite literally put the cat amongst the pigeons, so to speak. Once this silencer became embedded into the folklore surrounding this case, the police found themselves snared inside a trap created by themselves. They could not undo that which had already been done by their own hand. They  eventually found a means of extracting themselves from responsibility in Sheila Caffells death, by arresting, prosecuting and imprisoning Jeremy Bamber for committing the five murders, yet in so doing they created an even bigger paradox, one that one day soon, will come back to haunt them. What has saved them over the last 30 years or so, is that evidence of police wrong doings in this awful case is being withheld under pii. I do not believe that it is in the public interest to conceal the evidence which proves Jeremy Bambers innocence using pii legislation, any further...

[mike tesko]

(a) 07.15am - rifle seen leaning against bedroom window before police enter premises
(b) 10.25am - rifle photographed leaning against same bedroom window by PC Bird
(c) 11.10am - rifle photographed for the very first time on Sheila's body by PC Bird

[David1819]

A paradox...

Now try to establish what ammunition the armed response team had on that morning, to see if the wounds on Shelia could have been inflicted by their weapons

[mike tesko]

Now try to establish what ammunition the armed response team had on that morning, to see if the wounds on Shelia could have been inflicted by their weapons

It is already established that at least two firearms officers had Ruger mini 14 short rifles when they attended the scene, and that these two officers at least had both been issued with .223 ammunition.  Jeremy had until recently been unable to find out what weapons all members of the squad had been issued with or the amount and type of ammunition released to them from the force armoury, and what ammunition had been returned. Once this matter can be cleared up, then a true picture of what had actually taken place once the firearms officers got into the farmhouse can be made...

[mike tesko]

As with the nature of any paradoxical issue, any explanation proferred is not an absolute one, but depandent upon other factors which will always be contradictory, inconsistant and ambiguos. If there is no such opposing feature, as described, the matter under consideration can no longer be a paradox...

[mike tesko]

How many bullets were fired at Ralph Bamber, 7 or 8?

[mike tesko]

How many bullets were fired at Ralph Bamber, 7 or 8?

If only 7 bullets had been fired at him, there wiuld only be 7 cartridge cases belonging to these 7 bullets, not 8...

[scipio_usmc]

At 7.15am,  the anshuzt rifle was seen to be leaning against the bedroom window

False, Jeapes said she saw something in the boxroom window that appeared like the barrel of a rifle sticking up.  She said the object never moved.  Those who entered the bedroom saw the Anschutz on Sheila.  Clearly whatever Jeapes saw wasn't the Anschutz.  You just ignore reality and keep repeating the same bogus claim that the Anschutz was in the window though you have no proof to establish such.

No matter how many times you repeat the allegation, it will simply remain an unsubstantiated allegation.

Your claim there were too many spent casings is likewise false. There were 25 gunshot wounds, 25 spent casings and all of them were tied to the Anschutz.

[mike tesko]

False, Jeapes said she saw something in the boxroom window that appeared like the barrel of a rifle sticking up.  She said the object never moved.  Those who entered the bedroom saw the Anschutz on Sheila.  Clearly whatever Jeapes saw wasn't the Anschutz.  You just ignore reality and keep repeating the same bogus claim that the Anschutz was in the window though you have no proof to establish such.

No matter how many times you repeat the allegation, it will simply remain an unsubstantiated allegation.

Your claim there were too many spent casings is likewise false. There were 25 gunshot wounds, 25 spent casings and all of them were tied to the Anschutz.

Unfortunately for you, with Mrs Jeapes at the corner of white red, she would have been unable to see anything leaning against the box room window, so you need to rethink your theory...

[mike tesko]

Some deluded people, claim that Ralph was shot with 7 bullets which caused 8 wounds - now for those of you who know basic arithmetic, 7 bullets fired at Ralph, had 7 corresponding cartridge cases, 7 that is, not 8. There is therefore 1 additional mcartridge case recovered from the scene, added so that the police could argue that Ralph had been shot four tines non fatally whilst he was present in the main bedroom. According these people, only three bullets caused the 4 non fatal injuries to Ralph. So, that's one inconsistent statistic sorted out...

Then, we have one additional bullet found in the bedroom, a whole bullet...

[scipio_usmc]

Unfortunately for you, with Mrs Jeapes at the corner of white red, she would have been unable to see anything leaning against the box room window, so you need to rethink your theory...

I established beyond all doubt she was at the White Containment site.  Your lies jsut ruin whatever credibility you might have remaining in the eyes of some.  You night as well stop with the BS and just try arguing based on the actual facts instead of made up nonsense.