A paradox - with rifle at bedroom window, one bullet case too many linked to She

[mike tesko]

I am led to believe that he was arrested and interviewed under caution, but not charged, after Jeremy' himself became a suspect,..

[mike tesko]

' Judge and Lawyers blamed for trial bias '

JUDGE SIR MAURICE DRAKE  was accused of failing to secure a fair trial for James Robertson.  The Court of Appeal heard how Judge Drake 'neutralized' an important defence point when there was gross inconsistencies between eye witnesses descriptions.  It was stated that prosecution counsel operated without regard to the proper rules, and failed to ensure the the disclosure of fingerprints.  Defence Counsel seemed ' patently not to have read documents provided, which shows a lack of proper legal administration.

 

[scipio_usmc]

There is a photo of the work surface and phone in which it LOOKS as if there could be bloody prints on the edge of the counter top.

A lot of things can look like blood in a photo.  Those police who processed the scene in person found no fingerprints in blood anywhere in the house nor did the family later find any when they were going through things.

 

[scipio_usmc]

i would of thought bloody fingprints asuming they could a full print would be more or less proof of who did asuming the prints dident belong to june or ralph.

Those prints didn't belong to a woman,as they looked too big a hand. As already said,it would have been Neville leaning there,maybe after having phoned.

There were no bloody prints.  I can go into a detailed explanation about the potential things bloody fingerprints reveal but there is no point in bothering because THERE WERE NO bloody prints found in the house.  The ONLY transfer of blood anywhere at the scene was from Sheila's wrist to her gown.

[mike tesko]

A lot of things can look like blood in a photo.  Those police who processed the scene in person found no fingerprints in blood anywhere in the house nor did the family later find any when they were going through things.

 

Stop making things up, at least say something credible - there just so happened to be multiple drips of blood directly below where the bloodied fingermarks were present on the edge of the kitchen worktop, close to the phones handset off its cradle...

[scipio_usmc]

Not many of you will be aware of this, but during the first month of the main investigation (SC/688/85) whilst Witham police regarded the shootings as a case of 4 murders and a suicide, Southend on Sea police investigated each of the 5 deaths as murders, and they had a local man as the main suspect, these alternative investigations had there own Crime Reference Numbers, at the heart of which was use of the anshuzt rifle, and an antique weapon...

Dr Who, would you please stay in this reality plane.   

[mike tesko]

Dr Who, would you please stay in this reality plane.

Just goes to prove you know nothing about what went on in the background of this case...

[scipio_usmc]

Stop making things up, at least say something credible - there just so happened to be multiple drips of blood directly below where the bloodied fingermarks were present on the edge of the kitchen worktop, close to the phones handset off its cradle...

You are projecting, you are the one making things up. What you claim is a bloody print was not determined to be a bloody print by those at the scene.  Lincoln reviewed all the blood evidence did he cite a bloody print in the kitchen?  No!  Did the police or prosecution?  No!  You simply decided something in a photo looks to you like I could be a bloody print.  That is not evidence that is actually is. So you can't says there was a bloody print let alone assert there was a blood print belonging to a specific person.

This isn't the Adventures of the Black Hand Gang it is real life.  If you don't get that reference I am referring to one of my favorite books when I was around 7 years old.  Each drawing in the book had a clue and you had to find it to continue to solve the mystery.  It was by Hans Jurgen

[scipio_usmc]

Just goes to prove you know nothing about what went on in the background of this case...

The Sea Police?  Give me a break...

[mike tesko]

The Sea Police?  Give me a break...

Each of the five victims had a separate crime reference associated with them, from Southend on sea police station, now why do you think that was?

[mike tesko]

You are projecting, you are the one making things up. What you claim is a bloody print was not determined to be a bloody print by those at the scene.  Lincoln reviewed all the blood evidence did he cite a bloody print in the kitchen?  No!  Did the police or prosecution?  No!  You simply decided something in a photo looks to you like I could be a bloody print.  That is not evidence that is actually is. So you can't says there was a bloody print let alone assert there was a blood print belonging to a specific person.

This isn't the Adventures of the Black Hand Gang it is real life.  If you don't get that reference I am referring to one of my favorite books when I was around 7 years old.  Each drawing in the book had a clue and you had to find it to continue to solve the mystery.  It was by Hans Jurgen

It would have been a good idea to get Essex police to introduce that book as part of their training back in 1985...