The meeting with The Sun newspaper:

[guest154]

So SaraT is now coming in for a bashing.

I'm not bashing her. I just don't think there is anything possible that could convince her.

[lookout]

I'm not bashing her. I just don't think there is anything possible that could convince her.

Convince her of what exactly ?

[lookout]

Perhaps you'd like to present SaraT with a list of investigative evidence that EP convicted Jeremy of ?

[guest154]

Perhaps you'd like to present SaraT with a list of investigative evidence that EP convicted Jeremy of ?

That's been done numberous time on here. She will have read the evidence herself, I am sure she knows what convicted him. You just don't believe it. You choose not to believe it because you like Jeremy.

[Caroline]

So SaraT is now coming in for a bashing.

What? SaraT answered my post and I asked her a question in response. That's how a discussion works Lookout. Of course we could all just make sweeping statements like you do with nothing to back it up - but that wouldn't get any one anywhere.

[Caroline]

Convince her of what exactly ?

The thread title Lookout!! Although you have tried to take it off topic so many times now that I'm not surprised you have forgotten what it's all about!

[Jane]

The thread title Lookout!! Although you have tried to take it off topic so many times now that I'm not surprised you have forgotten what it's all about!

And she STILL hasn't answered my question :D

[guest154]

The thread title Lookout!! Although you have tried to take it off topic so many times now that I'm not surprised you have forgotten what it's all about!

Just keeps repeating "what evidence"....and then she ignores the replies to it anyway. Wish she would create her own topic if she wants to ask about the evidence, so the actual topic of this thread could be discussed.

And she STILL hasn't answered my question :D

I hope you're not holding your breath.

[SaraT]

Just keeps repeating "what evidence"....and then she ignores the replies to it anyway. Wish she would create her would topic if she wants to ask about the evidence, so the actual topic of this thread could be discussed.

I hope you're not holding your breath.

Are you talking about me?

[lookout]

That's been done numberous time on here. She will have read the evidence herself, I am sure she knows what convicted him. You just don't believe it. You choose not to believe it because you like Jeremy.

It's worse than MP's question time here as you never get a straight answer.
The fact that EP had nothing on Jeremy hasn't been done numerous times at all,especially a list,written by EP stating " what they found " in their investigations that led them to convict Jeremy.

I wouldn't say that I " liked the man " at all,it has nothing whatsoever to do with my support of him. I really don't know where you get your ideas from,you're worse than the press.
Jeremy is NOT my type at all. I go for real men,not excuses for one-----------sorry to disappoint.

[guest154]

Are you talking about me?

Are you actually serious?

I answered Caroline. Who was Caroline talking about? Who keeps asking "What evidence did EP convict Bamber on?"

Obviously talking about Lookout, not sure how you got confused there.

It's worse than MP's question time here as you never get a straight answer.
The fact that EP had nothing on Jeremy hasn't been done numerous times at all,especially a list,written by EP stating " what they found " in their investigations that led them to convict Jeremy.

I wouldn't say that I " liked the man " at all,it has nothing whatsoever to do with my support of him. I really don't know where you get your ideas from,you're worse than the press.
Jeremy is NOT my type at all. I go for real men,not excuses for one-----------sorry to disappoint.

You speak about him like he is a member of your family. You're not willing to listen or consider anything negative about him - not just connected to the murders. You're unpleasant to members that say anything negative about him. You spend a lot of your time supporting him here and elsewhere.

Can see why I think you like him!

[lookout]

Are you talking about me?

No Sara. Their favourite punchbag------------ME. Pathetic lot !!

[lookout]

 It's what happens if you support Jeremy,I'm afraid. Not good,is it ?

[Jane]

It's worse than MP's question time here as you never get a straight answer.
The fact that EP had nothing on Jeremy hasn't been done numerous times at all,especially a list,written by EP stating " what they found " in their investigations that led them to convict Jeremy.

I wouldn't say that I " liked the man " at all,it has nothing whatsoever to do with my support of him. I really don't know where you get your ideas from,you're worse than the press.
Jeremy is NOT my type at all. I go for real men,not excuses for one-----------sorry to disappoint.

You wouldn't say you "liked the man" but you DO say you like ALL those connected to him even LESS so I guess it's relative. ie You like HIM more than you like any of THEM.

[Caroline]

No Sara. Their favourite punchbag------------ME. Pathetic lot !!

You set yourself up for criticism Lookout and then claim you're being picked on. You're just as capable of dishing hostility as the next person.