The meeting with The Sun newspaper:

[Caroline]

Allegedly very soon -don't worry you wont have to join us there is not much room.

I don't need the dingy, I am no longer sailing aimlessly on the ancient Egyptian river - but glad there's a dingy on the way. Don't worry, I won't throw old posts in your face - there would be no point if you'd already admitted to have been wrong in the past!! 

[Jane]

What's non-evidence got to do with a fuss about nothing ? I thought it had everything to do with bagging the right person for the crime.

Without going back to look, I believe that what you said was along the lines of it being a lot of fuss about nothing because if no money had changed hands for the pictures, Jeremy couldn't be said to have sold them and was therefore NOT guilty of doing so. This was what gave rise to MY question of where you would place the acceptability of his actions on a scale of 1-10.

[Jan]

I don't need the dingy, I am no longer sailing aimlessly on the ancient Egyptian river - but glad there's a dingy on the way. Don't worry, I won't throw old posts in your face - there would be no point if you'd already admitted to have been wrong in the past!! 

I always admit when I am wrong .  And don't boast about being right.

And I was not throwing it in your face - I just asked why you had changed your mind about the Sun as well as Jeremy.

But its obvious as you say, everything he has said is a lie - therefore everyone else must  be telling the truth . I get it.


Like you have said we must not take this debate personally . Unless its Adam.

[nugnug]

You are a total and complete idiot . I have not one bit of respect or interest for your posts.

can we all agrea on this point i think we can

[lookout]

Without going back to look, I believe that what you said was along the lines of it being a lot of fuss about nothing because if no money had changed hands for the pictures, Jeremy couldn't be said to have sold them and was therefore NOT guilty of doing so. This was what gave rise to MY question of where you would place the acceptability of his actions on a scale of 1-10.

I would have thought my reply was evidence enough ?

[Jan]

can we all Dagrea on this point i think we can

well I do try not to be rude to posters unless pushed. 

[guest154]

I never said that he did nothing wrong

In your world Jeremy is a liar. The sun are liars . So two liars against each other so as usual we are no wiser.

Why are you still saying it's the sun VS Jeremy? It's surely The Sun & Colin VS Jeremy...you keep convieniently forgetting about Colin, Jan.

[lookout]

can we all agrea on this point i think we can

Priceless.

[Caroline]

I always admit when I am wrong .  And don't boast about being right.

And I was not throwing it in your face - I just asked why you had changed your mind about the Sun as well as Jeremy.

But its obvious as you say, everything he has said is a lie - therefore everyone else must  be telling the truth . I get it.


Like you have said we must not take this debate personally . Unless its Adam.

It felt that way and I have already admitted to being wrong in the past. I apologise for snapping.

I have changed my mind about The Sun because I didn't know that Colin backed the story - I have to admit to skip reading his book and I missed that part about the photographs/slides the first time. It is only recently that I have seen the Killing Mum and Dad documentary where the reporter recalls the meeting and I  think he sounds very credible. However, it is Colin who convinced me and also given that I think Jeremy is guilty, it doesn't surprise me that he would do such a thing.

Oh! And I also asked him about it and he didn't answer - he doesn't like difficult questions.

[guest154]

can we all agrea on this point i think we can

No, I don't think Adam is an idiot. I think he can be annoying and pompous, but he can also be quite funny and knowledgable.

At least he knows the case, which is more than can be said for some.

[Caroline]

I would have thought my reply was evidence enough ?

Evidence of what?

[guest154]

It felt that way and I have already admitted to being wrong in the past. I apologise for snapping.

I have changed my mind about The Sun because I didn't know that Colin backed the story - I have to admit to skip reading his book and I missed that part about the photographs/slides the first time. It is only recently that I have seen the Killing Mum and Dad documentary where the reporter recalls the meeting and I  think he sounds very credible. However, it is Colin who convinced me and also given that I think Jeremy is guilty, it doesn't surprise me that he would do such a thing.

Oh! And I also asked him about it and he didn't answer - he doesn't like difficult questions.

I've always believed the story, because I believed the reporter. When I found out he had actually given a statement (which I think I read on the red forum) it added credibility to his story - but as you say when Colin also backs up the story...it sort of seals it.

[Jane]

I would have thought my reply was evidence enough ?

Running with that belief, if silence is evidence -although of what, I don't know- then all the voices who answered your question must be evidence .

[lookout]

Evidence of what?

In answer to April's post.Stop looking for something that isn't there.

[Caroline]

In answer to April's post.Stop looking for something that isn't there.

Ha, ha! Exactly, there never is any evidence in your posts!! But at least you admit it!!