0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
How do you deduce that I am obsessed by Bamber? My few postings on the forum are all you have to go on, but you conclude that I am obsessed with Bamber but not the forum. With reasoning like that I am not surprised that you are prone to believing pseudoscience( not my new word, just the most accurate description of what you consider to be science). I looked into the amount of posts you made to check whether or not your claim of my obsession held any water(it didn't). It isn't just what I think about some branches of psychology. It is well recognised by most scientists, even amongst psychologists, that there are many branches of psychology masquerading as science that are nothing more than mumbo jumbo. Do some reading on it that isn't just confirmation bias and you may be able to discern the difference. What's to win here, by the way? If winning hinges on the credibility of yours and Kerry Daines diagnoses of psychopathy then you lost some time ago because the claims made are so self evidently ridiculous that they are self defeating.
If you are convinced that Kerry Daynes, or you or any of the other armchair psychologists on here can diagnose psychopathy from letters, blogs and subjective anecdotal tales then you will believe anything. I understand the concept perfectly well but I think that you struggle to recognise the difference between pseudoscience and science. Kerry Daynes claims certainly fall into the former category. The supposed "strikingly obvious fact that Bamber is a psychopath" is based on nothing more than whatever pseudo scientific rubbish you were last reading on the internet. I think you are probably taking the piss with these claims and are just trying to get a rise out of people because you cannot really believe that these claims are worthy of serious debate. Before you say, I aren't debating Kerry Daines claims, I am deriding them. As for me being "another obsessed Bamber supporter", I would suggest a little more self awareness before attempting put downs. A quick look in the members list shows that in your latest incarnation on here you have managed over 7,300 posts in less than 8 months, posting at a rate of more than 32 per day. At your current posting rate you are on course for nearly 1,300 posts in a year. My posting history shows that in over 4 years I have posted 772 times or one post every other day. it takes you, on average, 2 weeks and 4 days to post the same number of posts that I have made in over 4 years. The evidence quite clearly shows that you are the one who is obsessed, being by far the most prolific poster on the forum but also, ironically, the poster most likely to call someone obsessed.
Neville told BW he wouldn't be surprised if his life was cut short in the near future. In a shooting accident. Guess he shouldn't have invited Sheila over then.
CC said she had 'never used a gun'. So how did Sheila become the female Clint Eastwood. Loading, chambering and accurately shooting ?
