You haven't got a clue, you're just another obsessed Bamber supporter trying to discredit the strikingly obvious fact that Bamber is a psychopath. That won't change simply because you don't understand the concept. Actually gringo, your last sentence describes perfectly, you notion that Nevill Bamber called the police - meaning it is clearly groundless bollocks.
If you are convinced that Kerry Daynes, or you or any of the other armchair psychologists on here can diagnose psychopathy from letters, blogs and subjective anecdotal tales then you will believe anything. I understand the concept perfectly well but I think that you struggle to recognise the difference between pseudoscience and science. Kerry Daynes claims certainly fall into the former category.
The supposed "strikingly obvious fact that Bamber is a psychopath" is based on nothing more than whatever pseudo scientific rubbish you were last reading on the internet.
I think you are probably taking the piss with these claims and are just trying to get a rise out of people because you cannot really believe that these claims are worthy of serious debate.
Before you say, I aren't debating Kerry Daines claims, I am deriding them.
As for me being "another obsessed Bamber supporter", I would suggest a little more self awareness before attempting put downs. A quick look in the members list shows that in your latest incarnation on here you have managed over 7,300 posts in less than 8 months, posting at a rate of more than 32 per day. At your current posting rate you are on course for nearly 1,300 posts in a year.
My posting history shows that in over 4 years I have posted 772 times or one post every other day. it takes you, on average, 2 weeks and 4 days to post the same number of posts that I have made in over 4 years.
The evidence quite clearly shows that you are the one who is obsessed, being by far the most prolific poster on the forum but also, ironically, the poster most likely to call someone obsessed.
