I love how more than a day later you edit your post to instead of bothering to make a new one to try to slide under the radar.
"The explanation for the change to DB/1 and then DRB/1 and reasons for the changes are well supported"
no, Suspicious, I would say, because it should never happen, its not a good enough reason, to change any exhibit reference, or lab' item number... totally innocent.
The lab number to the moderator wasn't changed that is just another of your lies. Cook made an error on a single Holab form that he was writing 3 copies of. On one copiy he screwed up and wrote 23 instead of 22. The lab either never noticed the error or ignored it and used the correct number (22) on all their paperwork. So you keep lying to pretend there was a change that never happened. That makes you a lying joke.
Jones didn't know who found the moderator so he and Cook agreed to simply use his initials at the outset. Upon learning it was Boutflour and other items were also found by Boutflour and had been collected the items were all re-labeled DB/1-4. After finding out that David Bird already was using this they changed them to DRB/1-4. Nothing sinister or wrong occurred. That you choose not to accept the explanation given is your problem, it doesn't amount to a hill of beans. You can't prove anything sinister or wrong occurred and proving it is what would amount to something.
While you can't prove the police did anything wrong you lie regularly about seeing photos that don't exist, meeting informants who don't exist, lie about being part of a group working on Jeremy's defense though Jeremy kicked you to the curb... You are seeking attention and desperately want to pretend you are still in the loop so Jeremy supporters will admire you and give deference to you. It is quite sad that you can't find something more worthwhile to do with your life than lie to garner attention from Jeremy supporters.
"Your lies are just that lies and worse make no sense."
So, says you, but there is absolutely nothing you have had to say that I can't respond to, and the reason for that is because what I am saying is the truth, as compared to what you say all the time, which is repetitive
Your responses try to change the subject as opposed to dealing with the evidence and points I raise. You have zero ability to establish your claims make any sense. You have zero evidence to establish any of your allegations are true. You never offer any evidence you just claim you have seen evidence. Anytime you mess up and cite something posted on this site as evidence so we can go see if it states what you claim it invariably says the opposite of what you claim. Cook's COLP statement says he marked the moderator SBJ/1 not SJ/1 like you asserted. I posted the relevant portion of his statement proving it. You failed to respond by posting a section where he stated he marked SJ/1 on a label because there is no such thing in his statement. Instead you just ignored the evidence I posted and restated your unsupported lie. Bragging about being able to respond to anything I post by restating your lies is quite pathetic. What would mean something would be if you could respond with evidence proving me wrong and your claims true but that you can't do. Since you have no actual evidence you lie claiming you have evidence but that you choose not to post it. If you had the evidence you claim you would post it and unless and until you do post evidence there is no reason to believe a single thing you state because you lied too often in the past and now find yourself in the same situation as "the boy who cried wolf".
"Far from having any evidence to support wrongdoing you just have totally unsupported allegations which are refuted by the evidence"
not true, everything I have spoken about is supported by the contents contained in official logs, records, statements and photographs
Your claims are always refuted by the statements and evidence. You falsely asserted Cook's COLP statement indicated be put a label on the moderator marked SJ/1. Cook's COLP statement states he labeled the moderator SBJ/1 and the Holab forms he filled out the same day also state SBJ/1. I posted snapshots of these documents proving your claims false.
Jeremy said he didn't see AP's rifle at WHF after he left. AP says he took it home with him after he left. The family said they didn't find his weapon there when police turned over the house to them. The police didn't report finding or taking his weapon from WHF. On those occasions when AP did store his rifle at WHF he took the bolt home with him so no one could use his rifle in his absence. The ballistic expert matched all 25 casings used in the murders to Nevill's Anschutz rifle. You ignore all of this and insist AP's gun was present at the time of the murders and used. You are not following evidence you are ignoring it.
Eaton and the Boutflours say the moderator was found August 10, and turned over to police on August 12. Police say it was turned over to them August 12 and examined in the lab for the first time on August 13. There is no documentation to counter any of this. You ignore the statements and evidence and made up that Ann Eaton gave the moderator to police on September 11.
I can go on and on and on listing claims you make that are not supported by the statements and evidence from the case file but rather refuted by such evidence.
"make no sense"
do make sense
You failed miserably as establishing any sense to your allegations they are all absurd including your ridiculous assertion that Nevill purchased 500 rounds of a different variety of .22 caliber ammunition than his rifle used. How would it make sense to buy a different variety of ammunition than that used by his rifle? You claim the gun seller lied about selling him 22LR ammunition for his rifle chambered in 22LR and instead sold him something else. This is just plain absurd. Your other claims make just as little sense. Whenever it is pointed out that your claims make no sense and why they make no sense you don't follow up by providing some logical explanation you simply assert you feel the claims make sense. You can't prove they make sense or how you just make the unsupported claim they do make sense.
"and you even add lies like that it was originally labeled SJ/1"
every time you use the words, liar, or lies, I substitute it with truthteller, and truth the source you claim states that states no such thing. I choose to accept that it does
What you are effectively saying here is that you choose to ignore what the sources actually state and choose to believe they state something else. It is much like propagandists who say the truth is what people subjectively perceive it to be as opposed to what it objectively is. So if people believe the world is flat than it is flat even though it is really round. These kinds of games might intrigue someone who likes psychology but it doesn't intrigue someone like me who is driven by objective reason and facts.
"It wasn't referred to by two different numbers. It was always 22. The lab only referred to it as 22 The police had to hand write 3 copies of the Holab forms, they didn't use photo copy machines. Cook screwed up and wrote 23 on 1 of the 3 copies. The forms were identical except on one the numbers jumped from "21" to "23" while the numbers on the others read "21" and then "22"."
Hogwash, you baffoon, of course it was, lab' item 22 and then 23, renumbered 22 on 17 November 1985.
Ha, ha, ha, what a complete load of bullshit, your brain dead pal, and nuts to boot by accident while some accident, how do you explain there being no blood in the silencer (SJ\1) when he dismantled it on 29 August 1985? the other copies correctly said 22 DRB\1 was neither originally, lab' item number, 22, or 23...
The exact dates the remaining blood int he moderator was remove dis unclear because you won't post all the records that detail such. The section of the Dickinson report, trial testimony, the COLP report and anything else that details such you don't post. You post unsupported lies and say that since we don't have the documents we can't disprove your lies. The burden though is on you to provide evidence to prove your claims but you cannot because you claims are all made up lies.
You lied about Cook labeling it SJ/1 and lied about it being referred to as number 23 by the lab they referred to it at all times as 22 th eONLY document marked 23 was one of 3 copies that had a clerical error. You have no documents to establish otherwise and no documents to establish any moderator was ever submitted to the lab for the examination as DB/1 let alone DRB/1. The designations were changed after the lab found and removed the significant evidence.
You spend your time looking for clerical errors and inconsistencies you can weave giant fairy tales around. In the process you render yourself a laughing stock. Your so called friends don't care enough about you to be honest. They write off most of your claims as insane or unable to be understood so either don't respond to your posts or just respond to humor you. Convincing others you are a nut just renders yourself totally irrelevant- so you are achieving the exact opposite of what you want to achieve.
Maybe one day you will wake up and smell the coffee and recognize it.
"He admitted in his COLP interview that he made a clerical error"
Oh he made an error, alright, a blundering one. One that will eventually come back to haunt him, and the others involved in perverting the course of justice
COLP was aware of the error since 1991. They dismissed the error as a clerical error in their report. The defense lawyers could not even craft a submission around it for the CCRC. It's 24 years later already. You sound like Charlie Brown talking about the Great Pumpkin coming some future year.
