It is unrealistic that the family planted her blood and removed it from the rifle. The only allegation of planting that is plausible is the lab. That allegation would have been made even if police took the moderator themselves from day 1 . I don't believe that such would have resulted in Jeremy's defense being less vigorous and the various books etc not being published. Julie still didn't come clean till September and they still would not have processed the moderator till September unless Cook had some huge awakening in addition to the moderator being collected day 1.
I disagree Scip. No way do I think the family planted anything or that the lab was involved. The silencer had a rather bizarre history, of which most of us can agree on. The silencer was kept at the station for over a month as were the blood samples which were kept in the fridge.
Please don't bite my head off when I say this, but when the silencer was found, I suspect that it was fitted to rifle (18) before test firing or it was sent to the lab. The reason I think that is simple....in order to see if a shoe fits you first have to try it on and that is what I think happened to the silencer, it was fitted onto the rifle to see if it fit. Also it could have been contaminated. This does not explain how the DNA got under the baffles though.
Going back to trial the silencer was tested using the ABO method...
In 2002 they used LCN DNA the results of that test states that it may have been Sheila's DNA but the tests were inconclusive. They excepted that it was June's DNA and the other was that of an unknown male.
The unknown male is significant for it demonstrates the possibility of contamination. However, it cannot be certain that the DNA found came blood, so therefore the silencer/crowns case fails.
Spinning again
