Do you believe two decorated GRU veterans used fake names and fake passports just so they could fly over here to see Salisbury Cathedral one weekend as they claim?
That was post 645, David.
In my reply in the very next post, as I have patiently explained to you, it could be inferred quite easily that no I didn't believe that, but you didn't infer anything and repeated the question again.
From my reply in post 650 which you have quoted but obviously not read/comprehended.
"Note the word "either" at the end of that sentence. Your question was answered at the very beginning.
To be clear, although it was already to those who understand inference,
No." Later on from the same post,
My initial response was just to write the single word, "no", but I thought I would take the opportunity afforded by your dumb and irrelevant question to pose some better ones and signpost the way to Salisbury resident and blogger Rob Slane's excellent website and archive of the ever evolving story.
Again from the same post,
There you go, David. Answering No to your stupid question has zero effect on my "warped world view"
At the end of the same post,
By answering the way I did (
which means no in case it isn't clear enough still for David with his comprehension problems)
That post 650, was explaining to you, whilst deliberately piss taking admittedly, that I had already answered No by inference in post 646. The question was answered another 4 times (4 times!) explicitly in 650 as shown above.
I asked if you were really that
thick or piss taking(655) when you asked again in 653. Your reply was to ask again(657),
at least confirming that it wasn't a piss take, or so I inferred.
You add more questions when you can't even comprehend the answer to your first.
To be clear, before I move on from your state approved propaganda;
Your second question, if you could comprehend, was rendered irrelevant by the oft repeated answer to the first, also oft repeated, question. ie. the reason they didn't book a Cathedral tour was because they didn't go to visit the Cathedral, duh! Didn't need to ask, did you.
The reasons for visiting Salisbury is unknowable, but as I posited some time ago in reply to you on this thread, it is likely that there was some meeting/drop set up between Skripal and the two Russians. The available evidence of the Russians visits to Salisbury and their movements are way more suggestive of this being the motive rather than some bizarre cack handed nerve agent attack. The Novichok story should be too idiotic for anyone to believe. Window shopping after a clear act of war and being booked on a regular flight. There is no evidence to even suggest that they went to Salisbury to smear Novichok on a door handle that would stand up in a talking shop, never mind an impartial court. Regardless, it is for those making the accusations to have credible evidence before any alibi is needed.
https://www.theblogmire.com/the-claim-that-cctv-shows-the-salisbury-poisoning-suspects-in-the-vicinity-of-mr-skripals-house-is-deeply-misleading/ https://www.theblogmire.com/cctv-footage-shows-petrov-boshirov-close-to-the-skripals-only-its-not-at-mr-skripals-house/ A couple from the archives of the Blogmire. showing the CCTV evidence for the contradictory idiocy that it is (which now has the highest accolade available on this forum). David's conspiritard label which is confirmation enough for everyone else to know it must be good.
The CCTV coverage at the Skripal home, looking back, was assumed. He lived on the same road as his "D noticed" MI6 handler, Pablo Miller. It is a reasonable assumption made by many that Skripal and Miller's homes both had security(given their profession).
The officially and unofficially disclosed CCTV and stills evidence does not in any way support the wild claims.
Why was the roof and entire roof space replaced under view obscuring screens by workers in Hazmat due to supposed contamination? but not the door?
Why was the bottle, supposedly found by Charlie Rowley, in unopened Cellophane wrap?
Where is the opened bottle? Elsewhere? Did they have a cellophane wrapping machine with them?
Do you consider it plausible that Yulia and Sergei both succumbed simultaneously but 4 hours after supposedly contacting a deadly nerve agent?
Given their different genders, ages and weight, is it more likely that whatever they succumbed to was applied at the bench where they both, simultaneously collapsed?
Why no word from Sergei, even to his mother, who he previously contacted weekly?
Why only one stage managed appearance from Yulia? Where are they? Why no contact despite Yulia making clear in the one time she has spoken that she intended to return?
What are the UK gov hiding?
Are the Skripals political prisoners?
