Author Topic: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber  (Read 63924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #360 on: April 14, 2011, 12:53:PM »
Often hitmen are paid half up front and the other half on "completion" of the job.I cant see JB going down that route myself.What if the hitman blabbed or grassed.Also,JB would have left himself wide open to the possibility of blackmail once he received his inheritance.
Yeah that's what I insist on myself ;D

chelmsey

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #361 on: April 14, 2011, 12:57:PM »
John, Hartley, lady Chelmsey cast your mind back to documented information Sheila told Colin she wanted to get back with Colin on the trip to whf but he told her no he was in love with some one else

It is documented that Sheila was very strange that evening of the murders when she spoke to her Aunty

When police knocked on Colin caffells door with the news first thing he said she's done it then

Why would Colin say that?

As for Sheilas state of mind and depression etc chochokeira gives some very detailed posts and Andrea

Jackie.........I believe that somebody with Sheilas mental state is very capable of murder.But I cannot possibly believe for one minute that Sheila was responsible.There is no evidence whatsoever!

chelmsey

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #362 on: April 14, 2011, 12:59:PM »
Often hitmen are paid half up front and the other half on "completion" of the job.I cant see JB going down that route myself.What if the hitman blabbed or grassed.Also,JB would have left himself wide open to the possibility of blackmail once he received his inheritance.
Yeah that's what I insist on myself ;D

haha........u lot sure are in "wind up" mode today!  ;D

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #363 on: April 14, 2011, 01:04:PM »
Talking about his alibi.  Wasn't that what all the telephone calls were about and the asking police to call for him at the cottage?

Well if he was at whf shooting people then he couldn't have an alibi, so yes I think all the phone call business would have been an alibi of sorts, but placing Sheila as the prime suspect at the same time, sowing the suicide seed.

Offline joolz1975

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 391
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #364 on: April 14, 2011, 01:05:PM »
Absolutely John. I also dont believe that there was any family discussion that night regarding Sheilas boys being fostered.I think she was in too fragile a condition. JM, if to be believed said that when JB phoned her around 10pm,he told her that he was "pissed off".That tallies with the housekeeper who stated that when she phoned Ralph earlier in the evening that Ralph was very "short" with her and she got the impression that she had disturbed an argument going on.I believe that it was JB and Ralph that argued that evening and that was why Sheila appeared quiet and sullen.

Being a newbie I didn't know about the housekeeper Lady Chelmsey.  I think you could be onto something there. I don't believe for a minute that Nevill and June would suggest the boys be fostered away from the family.  If there was any talk about this could it have been that Nevill and June were wanting to take them under their wings??

That certainly makes more sense to me.  I suspect Jeremy wouldn't have liked that at all, his inheritance about to be divided several ways or go up in smoke completely if Nev and June were to take to the boys in a big way.
What about the letter that Colin Caffell sent Neville asking him to speak to Sheila about Colin taking on permanant care of the boys?

That could have been discussed and upset Sheila

John

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #365 on: April 14, 2011, 01:52:PM »


I dont know how true it is,but JMs mother stated that JB had told her a few weeks previous that June was considering changing her will in favour of the twins.

It often follow that when a couple alter their wills that they both do it.  I wonder if Nevill was considering the same thing?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #366 on: April 14, 2011, 06:02:PM »
Absolutely John. I also dont believe that there was any family discussion that night regarding Sheilas boys being fostered.I think she was in too fragile a condition. JM, if to be believed said that when JB phoned her around 10pm,he told her that he was "pissed off".That tallies with the housekeeper who stated that when she phoned Ralph earlier in the evening that Ralph was very "short" with her and she got the impression that she had disturbed an argument going on.I believe that it was JB and Ralph that argued that evening and that was why Sheila appeared quiet and sullen.

It was the secretary who rang and spoke to Nevill, not the housekeeper.

Don't forget that June told her sister that night on the phone that she was worried about Sheila.

Offline SUMMER

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 405
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #367 on: April 14, 2011, 08:34:PM »
[/font
Agree!
Why would Jeremy Bamber, who, we repeatedly hear is an intelligent man,
be such a motor mouth when it came to telling people , "apparently" that he "hated his family",
"could killl his parents", etc, ad infinitum, if he actually was planning to do such a thing?
He would have to be incredibly dim or halfway 'round the bend himself to not realize these
people might come forward if he was ever suspected of committing such an act!

John

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #368 on: April 15, 2011, 12:31:AM »


I dont know how true it is,but JMs mother stated that JB had told her a few weeks previous that June was considering changing her will in favour of the twins.

It often follow that when a couple alter their wills that they both do it.  I wonder if Nevill was considering the same thing?

Why would he tell her this if he was planning to murder his family, as JM alleged?

Why wouldn't he tell her?  Telling her that June was considered changing her will is a long way from murdering her.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #369 on: April 15, 2011, 04:49:PM »
Does anyone else feel that the applaud/smite system is being used to score points?

The Admin (Mike) has the ability to turn off the applaud/smite functionality from the forum altogether.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #370 on: April 15, 2011, 04:56:PM »
Does anyone else feel that the applaud/smite system is being used to score points?

The Admin (Mike) has the ability to turn off the applaud/smite functionality from the forum altogether.

I've been guilty of mis-using it. Both + and -    ;D   I think the applauds can become a bit 'back-slapping' and the smites go through the roof when the facebook croud carry out one of their marauding attacks on the site.  They work fine in moderation.  I think the site evens itself out over the course of time. 

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #371 on: April 15, 2011, 05:00:PM »
Yeah I think you're right, trick is just not to take it too seriously.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #372 on: April 15, 2011, 05:21:PM »
Yeah I think you're right, trick is just not to take it too seriously.
Just given you an applaud Hartley. I don't know the idea of them though? They're a bit childish if you ask me? ;D

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #373 on: April 15, 2011, 06:13:PM »
Does anyone else feel that the applaud/smite system is being used to score points?

The Admin (Mike) has the ability to turn off the applaud/smite functionality from the forum altogether.

I wish he would. Some people seem to be getting a bit obsessed about it. I haven't given anyone any applauds or any smites. It's not a popularity contest.  8)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Documentary tonight: Crimes that Shook Britain, Jeremy Bamber
« Reply #374 on: April 15, 2011, 07:23:PM »
Does anyone else feel that the applaud/smite system is being used to score points?

The Admin (Mike) has the ability to turn off the applaud/smite functionality from the forum altogether.

I've been guilty of mis-using it. Both + and -    ;D   I think the applauds can become a bit 'back-slapping' and the smites go through the roof when the facebook croud carry out one of their marauding attacks on the site.  They work fine in moderation.  I think the site evens itself out over the course of time.

I have given a looot of applauds and one single smite (to someone who more than deserved it  ;)).
I am fine with the applauds, but I really think that people have a right to their opinions, whatever they are. as long as they are not being obnoxious about them! You also have to consider, that you donĀ“t know who is behind the screen. Perhaps it is a person who one particular day can shrug the smites off - and another day just does NOT need them, but a pat on the back more than anything!  :)

It is a bit childish though, as Grahame says - true enough!