Two bodies in the kitchen. A time for closure ?

[Caroline]

I was simply showing a copy of a log where it refers to one dead male and one dead female, since you seemed to doubt it's existance.

I don't doubt it's existence, I have seen it hundreds of times. It gets debated on a regular basis.

[Janet ((Formerly known as Takeshi))]

I don't doubt it's existence, I have seen it hundreds of times. It gets debated on a regular basis.

My apologies Caroline I meant to say Jane not you. I have edited my post accordingly.

[lookout]

Ah! Perhaps one of the children had picked it up and Sheila took it away from him? In any case, IF it's true, it's of no moment because the killing was done with a rifle.

Well that's passed that off in the only way you operate-----with cunning.

[Jane]

Well that's passed that off in the only way you operate-----with cunning.

Cunning? How very droll. I'm really not certain why it is you want us to know that Sheila's fingerprints were on a shotgun -is this a fact?- when a shotgun wasn't used in the murders.

[lookout]

Cunning? How very droll. I'm really not certain why it is you want us to know that Sheila's fingerprints were on a shotgun -is this a fact?- when a shotgun wasn't used in the murders.

I'm well aware that a shotgun wasn't used----I didn't say it had been, but it had been handled by Sheila which, as usual, was denied as having been, or even in the vicinity at all.

[sami]

I'm well aware that a shotgun wasn't used----I didn't say it had been, but it had been handled by Sheila which, as usual, was denied as having been, or even in the vicinity at all.

who reported it had been handled by sheila

[lookout]

who reported it had been handled by sheila

I imagine EP did after it had been fingerprinted.

[Jan]

who reported it had been handled by sheila

you would have to ask Mike as he claimed this many times on this site

Also one of the authors i think Scott Lomax claims to have seen a document as well .

[Caroline]

you would have to ask Mike as he claimed this many times on this site

Also one of the authors i think Scott Lomax claims to have seen a document as well .

Yes, I emailed Scott Lomax some time ago on this very subject. He told me that he didn't have a reference for it but it must have come from the CT and that he didn't have time to look for it so I should contact them. I didn't bother given that previous attempts were met with a blank.

[lookout]

Yes, I emailed Scott Lomax some time ago on this very subject. He told me that he didn't have a reference for it but it must have come from the CT and that he didn't have time to look for it so I should contact them. I didn't bother given that previous attempts were met with a blank.

Quite busy with your various emailing aren't you ? Blimey, I'm NOT that interested in the case 

[Caroline]

Quite busy with your various emailing aren't you ? Blimey, I'm NOT that interested in the case 

Yes Lookout because I like the truth which is why I don't believe your last comment. Plus, I thought you didn't like to just take someone's word - or is that ONLY when it smells like guilt?

[Jane]

Quite busy with your various emailing aren't you ? Blimey, I'm NOT that interested in the case 

Yet you correspond with the person for whom this forum was formed?

[Caroline]

Yet you correspond with the person for whom this forum was formed?

Or does she? 

[Jane]

Or does she? 

Well, okay. She claims she does.

[lookout]

Yes Lookout because I like the truth which is why I don't believe your last comment. Plus, I thought you didn't like to just take someone's word - or is that ONLY when it smells like guilt?

Disinterested to a degree I suppose. I much prefer writing shopping lists these days. Asda is calling now.