The Threat.

[JackiePreece]

so you were letting him look at the magazine to see if he wanted to have publicity for the book in the magazine?

Exactly Jan, there was never any question of me passing sensitive information on to him

[Jan]

Jackie I am waiting let the forum see you are a woman who will stand up and be counted and apologise for your wrong doings.

I sympathise with you on this one if you feel you are due an apology -I never got one from Adam and have moved on , but it does still grate tbh.

[susan]

Jan I thank you for that it would appear in the midst of all this with Mason Doyle she is the victim no regard for my feelings by anyone on this forum you are the first.  Did you see the post that was removed as Justice said Adam would have been banned for that.  I congratulate you as you are a lady of high morals and integrity.  You did deserve an apology but at least he did not call you Mrs Busybody.  It is a disgrace she is allowed to do as she wishes on here and I suspect she will result in posters leaving.

[Alias]

Jan I thank you for that it would appear in the midst of all this with Mason Doyle she is the victim no regard for my feelings by anyone on this forum you are the first.  Did you see the post that was removed as Justice said Adam would have been banned for that.  I congratulate you as you are a lady of high morals and integrity.  You did deserve an apology but at least he did not call you Mrs Busybody.  It is a disgrace she is allowed to do as she wishes on here and I suspect she will result in posters leaving.

Susan, I have no idea what happened! If you feel violated, I am sorry!!

[ngb1066]

Jan I thank you for that it would appear in the midst of all this with Mason Doyle she is the victim no regard for my feelings by anyone on this forum you are the first.  Did you see the post that was removed as Justice said Adam would have been banned for that.  I congratulate you as you are a lady of high morals and integrity.  You did deserve an apology but at least he did not call you Mrs Busybody.  It is a disgrace she is allowed to do as she wishes on here and I suspect she will result in posters leaving.

That is an attack on the mods here and it is not called for.  The offending post was removed immediately. 

[Caroline]

The only way PH would know what she had given him, was to access it. As we don't know if he did or did not we can't really say that is was her login details at work or a website....I suspect it was the website. 

Anyway I have done talking about this as we are going round and round in circles.   

It was her login details for a work website, if you have to sign in, it's not for any Tom, Dick, Harry (or Paul) to view. You don't give your work details out to people but the point is PH would have no idea what she was giving him - with talk of databases, email addresses and login details - no wonder he was confused. You said yourself you're confused about it and this is after the fact. Her boss said she almost lost her job, she said she didn't - 

[guest154]

Maybe NGB can shed some light on it, as he is the one who actually posted it? 

I think it's strange to give ANY personal work details to someone online that you have never met.

[susan]

ngb I apologise for that remark it was not meant in the way it came over after reading it back.

[Jane]

It was her login details for a work website, if you have to sign in, it's not for any Tom, Dick, Harry (or Paul) to view. You don't give your work details out to people but the point is PH would have no idea what she was giving him - with talk of databases, email addresses and login details - no wonder he was confused. You said yourself you're confused about it and this is after the fact. Her boss said she almost lost her job, she said she didn't - 

So if he regards Jackie as such a highly valued member of staff, why isn't her boss suing someone for saying he said something he didn't?

[ngb1066]

Maybe NGB can shed some line on it, as he is the one who actually posted it? 

I think it's strange to give ANY personal work details to someone online that you have never met.

It was basically an invitation to look at the magazines published.  It did not afford access to the company's database or lists of clients and email addresses.  It was actually quite harmless although I agree that it was unwise and it could potentially have been misunderstood.  I would certainly not have done that. 

[ngb1066]

So if he regards Jackie as such a highly valued member of staff, why isn't her boss suing someone for saying he said something he didn't?

I imagine he did say that to Ben Borland, the journalist.  He is very senior at the newspaper and he fairly summarised the conversation he had with me.  That does not mean of course that what Jackie has related about her employer's comment to her is untrue.

 

   

[ngb1066]

ngb I apologise for that remark it was not meant in the way it came over after reading it back.

OK thank you Susan.

[Jan]

Jan I thank you for that it would appear in the midst of all this with Mason Doyle she is the victim no regard for my feelings by anyone on this forum you are the first.  Did you see the post that was removed as Justice said Adam would have been banned for that.  I congratulate you as you are a lady of high morals and integrity.  You did deserve an apology but at least he did not call you Mrs Busybody.  It is a disgrace she is allowed to do as she wishes on here and I suspect she will result in posters leaving.

No I did not see the post , as obviously it was removed - which is the right thing to do. And I have no problems with how the mods reacted when Adam insinuated I wrote the letter. I was just commenting that sometimes - on all sides  all it takes is sorry when someone has been upset - and then a ban would not even be necessary.

[Mr. Gee]

I think Adam  would have received a ban for the post that was from Jackie and quickly removed? Very uncalled for in my opinion, this is the sort of thing that lets you down. How anyone can defend those sort of posts is beyond me.

What post was that and why Adam in particular?

[susan]

Jan I was not asking for an apology to that post but in her email to Mason Doyle she did her best to discredit me by warning him about me.  Mason Doyle knows me well enough to take no notice but I thought she was not justified in doing that as I have never  been disrespectful to her and a simple sorry would have sufficed I was not wanting flowers or chocolates.  The other post was horrendous but the Mods acted very quickly and removed it I have no complaints at all about them and my post came over slightly different than I meant but I did what any decent person would do and apologise.