The Threat.

[Caroline]

Its not what the PM says but I wont be a parrot in keep repeating myself.  I have checked and checked and checked and there is no mention of Jackie saying that she will send him her log in details.  It would be rather a silly thing to do.

What she says is

"I will send you my work details, so you can see what I do"

As anyone can see it does not mention log in details nor does it mention anything about her giving him access to anything.  :D

There were two PM's Patti, the second one included her work login details.

[Patti]

There were two PM's Patti, the second one included her work login details.

Are you saying that NGb posted two PN's to PH from Jackie? I can only find one which was posted twice. I'll have another look...

[JackiePreece]

There were two PM's Patti, the second one included her work login details.

Caroline you are obsessed!
PH did not have access to any sensitive material
I told him to look at the magazines
Why don't you email him and ask was he paid for the article as I am sure the whole forum would like to know

[susan]

Jackie maybe whilst we are on the subject you will apologise to me for trying to discredit me to Mason Doyle.  Why would you do that what harm have I ever done to you.  NONE.  You are feeling violated and so am I.

[Patti]

Are you saying that NGb posted two PN's to PH from Jackie? I can only find one which was posted twice. I'll have another look...

I've found it. She is telling him to go online to look at the magazines Jackie gives him her password in order to view them....not her work Caroline but a website I believe. 

[Caroline]

I've found it. She is telling him to go online to look at the magazines Jackie gives him her password in order to view them....not her work Caroline but a website I believe. 

To anyone receiving that PM it looks like her work login, it doesn't matter if it's a website or a database or what - it's how it looks to the individual it was sent to that is important. It could easily have been misconstrued, especially after she later tried to discredit him by posting that he was contacting her.

[Caroline]

Caroline you are obsessed!
PH did not have access to any sensitive material
I told him to look at the magazines
Why don't you email him and ask was he paid for the article as I am sure the whole forum would like to know

I won't be emailing him or asking anything of the sort.

[Jan]

I've found it. She is telling him to go online to look at the magazines Jackie gives him her password in order to view them....not her work Caroline but a website I believe. 

so a bit like me giving someone my password to this forum so they could look at things without registering.

Nott quite the same as a personal work log in then.

[Patti]

To anyone receiving that PM it looks like her work login, it doesn't matter if it's a website or a database or what - it's how it looks to the individual it was sent to that is important. It could easily have been misconstrued, especially after she later tried to discredit him by posting that he was contacting her.

The only way PH would know what she had given him, was to access it. As we don't know if he did or did not we can't really say that is was her login details at work or a website....I suspect it was the website. 

Anyway I have done talking about this as we are going round and round in circles.   

[Patti]

so a bit like me giving someone my password to this forum so they could look at things without registering.

Nott quite the same as a personal work log in then.

Yes Jan similar to a book club....

[JackiePreece]

Patti if you go on to my company website you will see a live copy of the magazine I work on
Education Business. My name is at the front you will find it
I work in education and I don't work on counter terror or government business but I can place adds in all the magazine
For instance. A security firm might want to go in all magazines

I know no sensitive Info about the other magazines

[susan]

Jackie I am waiting let the forum see you are a woman who will stand up and be counted and apologise for your wrong doings.

[guest7363]

I think Adam  would have received a ban for the post that was from Jackie and quickly removed? Very uncalled for in my opinion, this is the sort of thing that lets you down. How anyone can defend those sort of posts is beyond me.

[Jan]

Patti if you go on to my company website you will see a live copy of the magazine I work on
Education Business. My name is at the front you will find it
I work in education and I don't work on counter terror or government business but I can place adds in all the magazine
For instance. A security firm might want to go in all magazines

I know no sensitive Info about the other magazines

so you were letting him look at the magazine to see if he wanted to have publicity for the book in the magazine?

[susan]

Jackie best reply in such a manner the Mods will not remove the post not good is it for the forum you are a woman lacking in social graces I fear and I will just have to make that as an excuse for your disgusting behaviour.