The Threat.

[Patti]

Why?

He didn't like his plunger 

[guest7363]

Jackie there is no need to pay anyone. You could take out what they call "Small Claims" in order to do this you must first of all determine whether or not this can be sorted outside of a court.  The first step in to make contact with the newspaper. You can ask for an apology which can be published in the paper concerned....

You could stretch that further by asking for compensation or a donation made to charity or campaign. The article made you stressful and very close to losing your employment. Not only that there is a finger pointing exercise to consider as well.

The first steps are required and if there in no joy, then its the small claims.....The last I heard it cost less than a tenner....to take a small claim out. Its another option as opposed to getting a solicitor and barrister involved. 

I always represent myself and I am in no way blowing my own trumpet...but, I won my case based on research.  The barrister for the opposition congratulated me and shook my hand.  The judge gave me everything I asked for and after 10 long years of fighting he wanted to know why I had not been offered what I had asked for 10 years earlier.  The judge also in my favour said the matter will be never be accepted in court in the future.  It was an amazing time, but a stressful one, but at the end of the day I fought for what was right and proved that it was justified.  What I fought for had no baring on what I really thought, it was the right thing to do and I knew that and so did the judge.  What I did was to relinquish all responsibility and place that into professional hands.   

Hi Patti but Jackie was not close to losing her job?

    Does it look like I am hanging on by a thread to my job?
In Fact I had a letter after all this saying I was an asset to the company

[Patti]

Hi Patti but Jackie was not close to losing her job?

    Does it look like I am hanging on by a thread to my job?
In Fact I had a letter after all this saying I was an asset to the company

Hi Justice

No, but that is not what reported in the newspaper....It said this: "severely rebuked" and was "hanging on to her job by a thread". 

[guest7363]

Hi Justice

No, but that is not what reported in the newspaper....It said this: "severely rebuked" and was "hanging on to her job by a thread". 

But Jackie is denying this on an open forum? In order to win the claim, you are going to need to prove that the false statement has always ruined your reputation.

[guest154]

No Patti, the article didn't make her almost lose her job. The EMAILS/PMs she sent did. How can it have been the article? Her employer spoke in the article that she almost lost her job because of the emails, so her warning at work obviously came before the article.

[Jan]

He did.

uncomfortable questions ? protection of reputation?

[guest154]

uncomfortable questions ? protection of reputation?

I can't even remember to be honest. It was 11 months ago and I didn't pay much attention to it. I didn't even read the full PM because it was so long.
Didn't like something I posted from what I remember.

[Jan]

No Patti, the article didn't make her almost lose her job. The EMAILS/PMs she sent did. How can it have been the article? Her employer spoke in the article that she almost lost her job because of the emails, so her warning at work obviously came before the article.

what ever you believe about the emails and pms and the interpretation of them,  the forum debate was the type of thing that happens ALL the time on forums . Many of us have been the subject of threats ( me for example as you know being reported to the police for aiding you in an argument)

But I have seen nothing that justified the naming and implication of Jackie and Ngb in the press.

How would you have felt if it was you , in the same article about a death threat?

I still feel that old arguments are colouring opinion about what has happened.

Unless I have missed something I can not see the justification for publication of that article

[Jan]

I can't even remember to be honest. It was 11 months ago and I didn't pay much attention to it. I didn't even read the full PM because it was so long.
Didn't like something I posted from what I remember.

I think you asked about Brett.

[guest154]

I think you asked about Brett.

I think  that was after he had PM'd me tbh.

[Neil]

Cutting through all the crap and dealing with this on a human level......what Harrison did to Jackie was pretty rotten.  It was a really cheap trick.   Sorry Susan!

[susan]

Ha Ha Neil not even sure what he did or did not do to anyone as I read the article in the Sunday Express I really have become confused with pm's/emails and I am totally lost and that is the honest truth this is why I have not been saying much.  I am sure what ever advice she gets from ngb it will be right and she should act on it.

[Patti]

No Patti, the article didn't make her almost lose her job. The EMAILS/PMs she sent did. How can it have been the article? Her employer spoke in the article that she almost lost her job because of the emails, so her warning at work obviously came before the article.

But the article claims she did and if that is not the case then the article is misleading. I can't understand how anyone can't see through the article to be honest.  He did not have to implicate anyone. The letter he is supposedly to have received was anonymous and threatened his life or was that also misleading?

There was no reason to mention a PM from Jackie was there? What was his reason for disclosing it? Once you have answered that then there is only one conclusion and that was to implicate her and her connections to NGB and Jeremy Bamber....

Deduced from it what you want, that is your entitlement. But, its not the way I see it unfortunately. Many  unanswered questions derives from the article which is aimed at this forum and its members....?? 

[Patti]

Cutting through all the crap and dealing with this on a human level......what Harrison did to Jackie was pretty rotten.  It was a really cheap trick.   Sorry Susan!

Words spoken with a level head Neil....and, I agree with you. 

[guest154]

But the article claims she did and if that is not the case then the article is misleading.

Her BOSS says she almost lost her job. It's a quote from her boss.  If you can't see that it's because you don't want to.