Why is it not fair to point out people have no valid basis for their claims?

[susan]

Hello ngb I thought that but was not sure if it was appropriate for me to post that as I thought he said alleged MOJ.

[Neil]

Hello tyler Mason Doyle told us on the forum not to believe anything we read in newspapers only believe what he himself told us.  I must ask has he said he thinks Jeremy Bamber is innocent or guilty I don't believe he has.

Hi Susan, you have my sympathy for all the grief you've had recently, it's been painful to watch.

Did Mason Doyle influence your change of stance at all ?

[ngb1066]

That's true but he didn't say he didn't know the answer, he said he couldn't remember the question! He had the question written in the letter I sent so he didn't need to remember it, he just had to read the letter again!

In fairness Caroline he does receive a large volume of correspondence.  I am not sure how easy it would be for him to retrieve a letter from weeks or months earlier.

[tyler]

Hello tyler Mason Doyle told us on the forum not to believe anything we read in newspapers only believe what he himself told us.  I must ask has he said he thinks Jeremy Bamber is innocent or guilty I don't believe he has.

Hi Susan.No,I dont think he has ever stated whether he believes Jeremy to be innocent or guilty.But he has stated that he believes his case to be a MOJ due to corrupt evidence I believe? From what I understand,he now believes Jeremy to be guilty but still believes the evidence used to convict him was corrupt. Last time he posted on here,he referred to Jeremy as an 'alleged' MOJ. If the evidence used to convict somebody is corrupt,then is that not a MOJ? Regardless of guilt or innocence?

[ngb1066]

Hello ngb I thought that but was not sure if it was appropriate for me to post that as I thought he said alleged MOJ.

He did say alleged, and emphasised it.  He posted it here so there is no problem referring to it.

[susan]

Neil thank you for your kind words.

[nugnug]

all i saw MD say was what he has allways said that he wasnt sure jeremy was innocent.

[guest154]

Then why did Jackie offer to use her jobs resources to promote the book for him? 

[ngb1066]

Then why did Jackie offer to use her jobs resources to promote the book for him? 

I imagine because she had no reason to believe he had changed his mind.

[susan]

Hi ngb  we are correct then in assuming that Mason Doyle now thinks he is guilty I did feel when he came on the forum at first he was leaning towards innocence don't think he actually said one way or another.  I am surprised you say you don't think the book will be published.

[ngb1066]

Hi ngb  we are correct then in assuming that Mason Doyle now thinks he is guilty I did feel when he came on the forum at first he was leaning towards innocence don't think he actually said one way or another.  I am surprised you say you don't think the book will be published.

I think he was more than leaning towards innocence, as illustrated by the press report based upon what his publisher had put out.

I do not know whether the book will be published, but my hunch is that it will not.  Obviously I could be wrong about that.

[Mr. Gee]

I don't agree.  I was never left with that impression. 

Perhaps it was just wishful thinking on your part, or, I suppose, you may have quite reasonably assumed that he wouldn't be bothering to write a book in favour of guilt, because....well...what would be the point?

No Neil I made that assumption because of (1) What he said about himself and (2) Because all Jeremy supporters were under that impression as well.

[Mr. Gee]

Hello tyler Mason Doyle told us on the forum not to believe anything we read in newspapers only believe what he himself told us.  I must ask has he said he thinks Jeremy Bamber is innocent or guilty I don't believe he has.

I believe that you also thought he was a supporter and I assumed that seeing that you were supporting him and you yourself were a supporter and therefore you in turn gave me the impression that he was writing a book in support or Bamber.

[nugnug]

i never saw him say he thought jeremy was innocent or guilty.

[susan]

Mr Gee you are quite right but Mason Doyle never actually told me he thought Jeremy was innocent I wrongly assumed and I was Jeremy innocent supporting him