Why is it not fair to point out people have no valid basis for their claims?

[nugnug]

what qustions could he answer if hes guilty hes not going to give a truthfull answer and if hes innocent he wont know any of the answers.

[Caroline]

what qustions could he answer if hes guilty hes not going to give a truthfull answer and if hes innocent he wont know any of the answers.

That's true but he didn't say he didn't know the answer, he said he couldn't remember the question! He had the question written in the letter I sent so he didn't need to remember it, he just had to read the letter again!

[Jan]

That's true but he didn't say he didn't know the answer, he said he couldn't remember the question! He had the question written in the letter I sent so he didn't need to remember it, he just had to read the letter again!

Can I just ask you Caroline - did Jeremy just send a letter out of the blue?

And did he specifically say you had been named as changing your stance , and not anyone else ? Is that why he started writing again?

Does he sound hopeful about the immediate future and his chances of success?

[Caroline]

Can I just ask you Caroline - did Jeremy just send a letter out of the blue?

And did he specifically say you had been named as changing your stance , and not anyone else ? Is that why he started writing again?

Does he sound hopeful about the immediate future and his chances of success?

Yes he did, he said 'the gossips had told him' I had changed my view and yes he sounds very hopeful - he always does.

[Jan]

the reason I asked -and I am being 100% honest - I wrote to him months ago(june I think) to discuss my correspondence with the home office.It was also to discuss certain documents on the forum that "allegedly" Sheila had written ( you know the ones I mean)  I did express my disappointment with the change in the forum and how it had changed and I found it strange that some administrators of the site which I thought was supporting him now thought he was guilty. This was nothing that I had not ( as you know) said in public on the forum. However I NEVER mentioned any names or gave ANY reason for that change of heart . And I still have the copies of the letters to prove that.

I am not worried about the above - because I never said anything to stir or give any information about who was involved . But I just wanted to make sure you had not mis-interpreted his letter and were accusing someone of something they had not done.

He in return gave me information about the documents I mentioned and told me his feelings about the forum , which as they were in a private letter and not on a public forum I would never reveal.

[Caroline]

the reason I asked -and I am being 100% honest - I wrote to him months ago(june I think) to discuss my correspondence with the home office.It was also to discuss certain documents on the forum that "allegedly" Sheila had written ( you know the ones I mean)  I did express my disappointment with the change in the forum and how it had changed and I found it strange that some administrators of the site which I thought was supporting him now thought he was guilty. This was nothing that I had not ( as you know) said in public on the forum. However I NEVER mentioned any names or gave ANY reason for that change of heart . And I still have the copies of the letters to prove that.

I am not worried about the above - because I never said anything to stir or give any information about who was involved . But I just wanted to make sure you had not mis-interpreted his letter and were accusing someone of something they had not done.

He in return gave me information about the documents I mentioned and told me his feelings about the forum , which as they were in a private letter and not on a public forum I would never reveal.

Jansus, he didn't know I was an admin here (as far as I know) and he mentioned me specifically and used the term 'gossips' to describe the person who had told him.

[guest154]

Jansus, he didn't know I was an admin here (as far as I know) and he mentioned me specifically and used the term 'gossips' to describe the person who had told him.

Did he describe it as heavy gossip?

[Jan]

Ok that's fine - Then it does sound like someone mentioned you specifically and that was not me.

Just wanted to make sure because some fires on here don't need anymore "fanning" if you know what I mean.

perhaps it will backfire on the person and you may learn more about the case going forward than they will.

I am a great believer in what goes around comes around.

[Jan]

Did he describe it as heavy gossip?

whats heavy gossip when its at home?

[nugnug]

Jansus, he didn't know I was an admin here (as far as I know) and he mentioned me specifically and used the term 'gossips' to describe the person who had told him.

who ever contacted him must know your real identity and your online identity how many people would that be.

[Caroline]

who ever contacted him must know your real identity and your online identity how many people would that be.

They only need to know my name is Caroline because that IS my real name and that I live in Co. Durham. I have never hidden who I am! I have no need to.

[Caroline]

Did he describe it as heavy gossip?

Heaviest!!

[guest154]

Heaviest!!

 

[Jane]

Ok that's fine - Then it does sound like someone mentioned you specifically and that was not me.

Just wanted to make sure because some fires on here don't need anymore "fanning" if you know what I mean.

perhaps it will backfire on the person and you may learn more about the case going forward than they will.

I am a great believer in what goes around comes around.

Let's hope it does, Jansus.

Frankly, I can think of nothing more despicable. I always wonder what sort of vicarious pleasure is to be gained by doing such a thing. WHY would one wish to cause doubt in another's mind unless there's an ulterior motive?

[Jan]

I am not sure - you see I always like to see the good in people. And I have no idea what has gone on in the past on here - but I can see it has been very divisive.

Does it have to have been someone from here though - could it be someone from the other forum who visits here?

The fact is that as a result it appears that Jeremy has contacted Caroline so I am assuming that he does hold her opinion in some regard.

 Perhaps he might put her mind at rest - or even the opposite  convince her more of his guilt?.

 The one good thing is because of his writing at least you always know the letter in genuine .