Author Topic: 98% of the evidence at trial, and appeal, nothing but bullshit...  (Read 5712 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: 98% of the evidence at trial, and appeal, nothing but bullshit...
« Reply #60 on: September 26, 2014, 03:40:PM »
Lookout I have always had tremendous admiration for her because she has refused to talk about her relationship with Jeremy and has always remained very loyal to him in spite of what happened between them. It has been said that the Campaign Team were responsible for the breakdown in their relationship whether this is true or not I don't know.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: 98% of the evidence at trial, and appeal, nothing but bullshit...
« Reply #61 on: September 26, 2014, 03:53:PM »
 Hi Susan,I'd always considered her to be a genuine person. I'm afraid there aren't many in the Campaign team who I'd class as truly loyal or genuine,as I'm sure Jeremy will come to realise,if he already hasn't. It's someone like AA who will be a boon to him in the coming years as she seems to know how his mind thinks as well as his overall outlook on the future,as it's going to be tough for him.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: 98% of the evidence at trial, and appeal, nothing but bullshit...
« Reply #62 on: September 26, 2014, 03:58:PM »
lookout you could be right think AA was with Jeremy way back at the beginning and he will probably be a different person now than when she knew him.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: 98% of the evidence at trial, and appeal, nothing but bullshit...
« Reply #63 on: September 26, 2014, 04:04:PM »
Institutionalisation is very difficult to overcome,and there has to be heaps of patience and understanding involved. Counselling offer such services of course,but it's going to be a long,hard road.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: 98% of the evidence at trial, and appeal, nothing but bullshit...
« Reply #64 on: September 26, 2014, 04:53:PM »
32 statements of JM. Another thing in this case that intrigues me. What more could she have to say? Of course we can only speculate can't we. ::)

32 interviews not statements and for the record I seem to recall 33 total when I counted. Not all interviews resulted in statements.  The statements were only when she told the something that they wanted documented in a statement.  Some of these interviews were to make her review and sign the typed up versions of her statement  At least 2 of the interviews were before she started telling everything she knew. Some where when they went to her house to search it.  If you narrow it down to just ones where they spoke with her to ask her additional quesitons and for additional information there are not nearly as many and it is common to have to go back to a witness when you have developed additional information and want clariification with respect to a point or several points.   

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry