Is that so? Most of the guilters convince themselves of Jeremy's guilt from hearsay,incomplete logs and statements and statements from those that had a vested interested in Jeremy being convicted.
What hearsay? What evidence are the logs supposed to present?
I have laide out the evidence used to convict him many times. No defenders have presented any evidence to refute such and instead just spout myths and how Jeremy was a great guy who would never do a such a thing. At the end of the day there is no contest at all and that seems to explain why Jeremy is sitting where he is.
Had Sheila loaded the gun she would have had elevated lead on her hands. Had she fired the gun she would have had GSR on her hands and on her clothing. Many of the shots were close enough that the killer would have had high velocity impact spatter on his/her clothing and medium velocity spatter from beating Nevill. The killer also would have scratched/cut his/her hand when the rifle stock broke unless the killer was wearing gloves. The killer also would have been stepping on broken glass and crockery hence injured his/her feet if barefoot. Sheila had none of these things. Nor did she have any reason to wear gloves, wash and change her clothes though she would not have been able to get rid of her bloody clothing anyway it would have to have been at WHF still or to heal her injuries. So it is quite apparent she had not committed the murders. Nor could she have shot herself without getting any GSR on her gown and worse yet after she was dead she could not have removed the moderator and put it away, walked back upstairs lied down and put the gun on her body. So it is apparent she can't have killed herself.
Since she didn't do it that means the alleged phone call from Nevill to Jeremy was made up. Further evidence it was made up and just an effort to frame Sheila is:
1) Nevill making such a call makes no sense
2) The time Jeremy attributes to Nevill's call is after the roomates say he called Julie
3) His other bogus efforts to frame Sheila including the tale about leaving the gun and bullets in the kitchen and proof the bullets were staged because there were too many left for that to have been the supply used to commit the murders
4) Jeremy's actions not being in accordance with someone who received the call he claims to have received from Nevill
5) Testimony from Julie that he told her in advance that he would be pretending he got a call from Nevill
That leads to Julie's overall testimony that Jeremy was planning this for a long time and admission he was behind it.
Sheila clearly didn't do it so who did? Since Sheila didn't do it and there was no call from Nevill as claimed how coudl Jeremy known about the murders and notify police? He only way is if he was the killer and the only reason he would frame Sheila was if he was the killer.
That is the evidence upon which Jeremy was convicted. naturally there are other detials like Jeremy hiding the kitchen phone and replacing it with the bedroom phone but the main thrust is the above.
