No mud on the wheels or tyres matched the samples of mud taken from the footpaths along the route proposed by Robert Boutflour, so there is zilch evidence to link that bike to any of the coastal footpaths, it was all speculation, no hard evidence, no tyre tracks, no eye witness accounts, no blood on the bike at all from any of the five victims, nothing on the pedals, nothing of evidential value found at Jeremys cottage to remotely suggest that he had been at the scene when any of the five victims had been shot, individually and or collectively...
Speculation, that was all they had, that is all they had got, and nothing has emerged in the 29 years or so, to change that amount of speculation, into hard evidence...
The window evidence falls well and truly into the 98% of bullshit, that was introduced to deliberately cloud the issue, or to put it another way, it was part of the so called weight of the evidence which the jury were invited to take into account when deliberating their verdict...
None of it proved Bamber had been present at the scene at the time of the shootings...
He's innocent, and verdicts need to be quashed....