Dr Ferguson had no idea about the condition of Sheila at the time of the tragedy, and I don´t think he could be arsed about her in the first place. Read the three statements we have in the documents´ section, read them carefully. He had no idea about her medication, he knew nothing about her, and he did not care one bit!
He was a doctor who did not do a thing when a very ill mother said that her little boys were the devil´s children, were woman haters, were capable of killing and raping her (!). He did nothing to protect those children - other than pumping their mother full of, and I mean full of medication. 200mg Haloperidol every two weeks. Unheard of, really.
This doctor was a disgrace, citing what he said about Sheila is an even bigger disgrace. Go read it for yourselves. He had no idea about Sheila and he couldn´t care less, this man was washing his hands, he knew he had done wrong.
Sheila had not had any "successful treatment" after she said about her little boys they were the devil´s children and were capable of killing her - scipio keeps claiming that. Tell me, what successful treatment?
Her treatment in the hospital in 1983 was considered successful. Her delusions stopped and the only recorded cases of delusions after her treatment was when she stopped taking her medication.
You have no evidence to establish otherwise. Provide us with a documented case of her having a delusion when she was on her medication. The defense coudln't provide any examples at trial so naturally you won't be able to either.
Nor can you provide any evidence of her telling anyone that after her treatment she contemplated suicide. Provide a statement of someone that says she told them she contemplated suicide on a date that is after she was released from the hospital in 1983. You can't. All you can do is provide a handful of statements where she told peopel that she had conteplated suicide in the past. One is from Ferguson who made clear she had such thoughts before she started her treatment but made no mention of any such thoughts after. Another is Grimster who she told she contemplated suicide in the past. She discussed her sickness before she was treated with Grimster os no evidence as to her indicating she contemplated it recently.
The only testimony abou her kids was from Ferguson who insicated she had delusions about them before she was treated in 1983. he said that after her treatment she didn't mention and delusions about her family anymore.
If you want to maintian that she was suicidal in the months before the murders then you need to provide evidence of that. The burden is on you to find peopel who claim she told them she was contemplating suicide during that time. But you have no such evidence so try to play games pretending she told Grimster she was suicidal but that is clearly untrue.
If you want to maintain she was having delusions about her kids and could harm them as a result around the time of the murders then you need to produce evidence of such. Evidence from her doctor that she had such delusions before she was treated and never discussed having any after released in 1983 does not establish such.
You and other Jeremy supporters ignore the physical evidence and strain to suggest that Sheila would commit the murders hoping that somehow that can void the physical evidence but it would no be able to void the physical evidence even if you did have evidence she could possibly kill herself and her kids. But you have no such evidence just strianing and misrepresenting to try to pretend,
It is just like the straining to tyr to pretend there were 3 moderators, strianing to pretend Nevill made a phone call to police, straining to pretend Jeremy had no way to get out of the windows and lock them...
At the end of the day Jeremy supporters strain to do anything to avoid facing relaity and to try to pretend their claims have some evidentiary support though they do not.