PAGE 42 OF LOMAX'S BOOK !! HERE'S THE FULL PARAGRAPH FOR THE " HARD OF SEEING "::
Quote, "It is known that Sheila had been considering ending her life for at least 4 months before her death and she had contemplated KILLING HER CHILDREN AND MOTHER FOR UP TO TWO YEARS before the fateful night. Therefore it is possible that during the discussion regarding care of the twins,if the discussion did take place,Sheila could have reasoned that she should act out her intentions.She would not have needed to have become very angry or out-wardly upset in order to consider killing because the idea was already in her mind.As her behaviour and thoughts had centred upon religion it is entirely believable that she did not have fear of carrying out the massacre because she believed it was the right thing to do. Her passive response could have been an indication that it did not matter to her what her parents wanted for the children because she had made up her mind that the children were to be shot,that her mother was to be killed in order to cleanse her evil mind and she too was to commit suicide so that she could go to a better world,free of suffering and evil,UNQUOTE".
AS WRITTEN BY THE HAND OF S.LOMAX. PAGE 42 OF HIS BOOK,EVIL,ALMOST BEYOND BELIEF ?.
Lomax's claims are ambiguous and wrong. I posted the part where he referenced his supposed evidence. Her 1983 release- which discussed her situation prior to being treated. it is unclear whether he was suggesitng he was considering suicide for the entire 4 months prior to her death or is claimign that 4 months before her death she said she contemplated suicide. There is no support for either though.
His other claim is equally ambiguous. Was he suggesting that it had been two years before that she contemplated killing them or contemplated it for the entire 2 years preceeding her death?
What support did he offer for his contentions? Gain a letter that doesn't say anythign about contemplating killing anyone. Rather saying she thought she could be capable of killing her sons to protect herself from them harming her. She didn't say she contemplated killing them of anyone else.
Lomax's book is full of gross distortions as he makes a pathetic attempt to establish Jeremy is innocent. Most of his claims are not supported by evidence and many of his claims are ambiguous.
The facts are as I described them:
She intimated that prior to her 1983 treatment that she had delusions that her children could do violence to her and if they did she thought she was capable of killing them. But these delusions stopped upon being treated and she didn't mention having them again.
She also intimated that prior to her treatment she had thought about suicide.
In 1985 the day after she got out of her second stint in the hospital she told someone about how she was being medicated because she had delusions and in the past had considered suicide.
These are the facts not Lomax's pitiful mischaracterizations or yours.
