Was Sheila carried to the main bedroom ?

[Adam]

There is no reason why Sheila would wake during a Jeremy massacre. Thread already created. There was a silencer, probable shut bedroom doors, sleeping twins and two adults shot in bed. The only noise was a brief  kitchen fight in another part of WHF.

People say it did not look like Sheila slept in her bed. This could be because Jeremy staged it this way. Or it could be that Sheila slept on top of the bed. Quite possible in August.

Sheila was petite, under sedation according to the 2002 appeal,  perhaps asleep on top of her bed. So not hard for a fit Jeremy to put the rifle down, then pick Sheila up and carry her a few feet. This would take a few seconds.

Neville and June were now dead, the twins either asleep or dead. Jeremy had time to work out an effective way to  pick Sheila up.

By the time Sheila had started waking, bang bang.

Another poster said today it is offensive to suggest Sheila was carried a few feet. One thing is for sure, she was either lead to the main bedroom, or retreated to the far corner when seeing the figure of a gun man in the dark.

Carrying Sheila is more practical than waking her and walking her to the bedroom. It means Sheila remains asleep or half asleep for longer. So more time to aim the rifle.

Do other people think Sheila may have been carried to the main bedroom.

[Jan]

No

[lookout]

No,for the hundredth time.

[Alias]

I can´t believe this!  AGAIN!

[lookout]

 I just think that they're both here to antagonise.The best thing being,is to ignore them.

[scipio_usmc]

There is no reason why Sheila would wake during a Jeremy massacre. Thread already created. There was a silencer, probable shut bedroom doors, sleeping twins and two adults shot in bed. The only noise was a brief  kitchen fight in another part of WHF.

People say it did not look like Sheila slept in her bed. This could be because Jeremy staged it this way. Or it could be that Sheila slept on top of the bed. Quite possible in August.

Sheila was petite, under sedation according to the 2002 appeal,  perhaps asleep on top of her bed. So not hard for a fit Jeremy to put the rifle down, then pick Sheila up and carry her a few feet. This would take a few seconds.

Neville and June were now dead, the twins either asleep or dead. Jeremy had time to work out an effective way to  pick Sheila up.

By the time Sheila had started waking, bang bang.

Another poster said today it is offensive to suggest Sheila was carried a few feet. One thing is for sure, she was either lead to the main bedroom, or retreated to the far corner when seeing the figure of a gun man in the dark.

Carrying Sheila is more practical than waking her and walking her to the bedroom. It means Sheila remains asleep or half asleep for longer. So more time to aim the rifle.

Do other people think Sheila may have been carried to the main bedroom.

If she was carried I would imagine she would be kicking and screaming the entire way not remain asleep.

It makes no difference all whether she:

1) was gragged,carried or

2) was marched at gunpoint or

3) ran into the room to escape from Jeremy and got trapped there or

4) ran into the bedroom to look for the telephone or

5) some other reason

The fact of the matter is that she somehow ended up there sitting down propped up against something so Jeremy could shoot her.

[Adam]

Why would she be kicking and screaming ?

She was on top of the bed, asleep. Under sedation.

Jeremy would just have to put one arm under her knees and one arm under her back. Then scoop her up. She was not heavy.

[Adam]

I just think that they're both here to antagonise.The best thing being,is to ignore them.

This is a serious thread.

The evidence makes it certain that Sheila did not commit the massacre. So how she ended up in the corner of the main bedroom is open for discussion.

[Caroline]

This is a serious thread.

The evidence makes it certain that Sheila did not commit the massacre. So how she ended up in the corner of the main bedroom is open for discussion.

And it's been discussed, everyone said 'no' - you got your answer. 

[Alias]

And it's been discussed, everyone said 'no' - you got your answer. 

The "no-s" were meant dead-seriously both then and now!
Adam, Sheila was not a baby, will you stop this! I find this insulting towards Sheila!

[Adam]

Do you think Sheila was and lead or retreated to the corner when seeing Jeremy ?

She was not a baby. But asleep, on top of a bed and a few feet from the main bedroom. She was also light, being a recovering anorexic.

[Jane]

Do you think Sheila was and lead or retreated to the corner when seeing Jeremy ?

She was not a baby. But asleep, on top of a bed and a few feet from the main bedroom. She was also light, being a recovering anorexic.

I think it's just possible that you may have received all the answers, on this topic, that you're going to get, however much you try to pad it out.

[lookout]

Do you think Sheila was and lead or retreated to the corner when seeing Jeremy ?

She was not a baby. But asleep, on top of a bed and a few feet from the main bedroom. She was also light, being a recovering anorexic.

Sheila wasn't anorexic. Read the coroners report.She was described as a WELL NOURISHED female !!

[Adam]

If still asleep, Sheila had to be taken out of her bedroom to the middle of the carnage. To make seem like she was the killer. Complete with gun and bible.

If I was Jeremy I would try to move her without waking her. Which gives him more time to aim the rifle. Waking her and leading her outside is just as risky as carrying her.

[Adam]

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=yFzuU6uBI4-y7Aau7ID4Cg&url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/7764238/lack-of-appeal/&cd=2&ved=0CB8QFjAB&usg=AFQjCNFk-fYpsTLnil2ncFLfLZi2rJcKHQ

This article says she was a recovering anorexic.

It also says she is a small thin woman. So easy to pick up.