Me neither.Don't see the point if it's no good to start with.
If it was bloodied water,why put childrens clothes in it ?
This goes back to an argument I had in the past over this issue with supporters. Her September 1985 statement references only bloody panties.
Her 1991 statement references panties and track suit bottoms but doesn't specify anything beyond the panties were bloody. I said how do you know the others were bloody and never got a satisfactory answer but didn't care because tracksuit bottoms with a bloody crotch is meaningless even if true.
The testimony is what makes clear the other clothes were children's clothes and simply dirty not bloody. So all the wild tales about Sheila wearing the leggings goes out the window.
Interesting how the testimony about the clothes being thrown out was not posted:
I never saw her testimony before I knew she threw the clothes out because of her 1991 statement:
Note the first passage makes clear the bin in question near the dish washer is a rubbish bin.
Note also that when Ann was thoroughly cross examined the defense did not ask her a thing about the bloody panties or dirty kid's clothing. That shows you how insignifcant such are.
