This issue is on of those which demonstrates the desperation and absurdity of Jeremy supporters.
1) Water sitting in a buck for days stinks let alone contmainated water
2) Stained clothes are soaked in a bucket before washing to try to keep the stain from setting
3) How many soak clothes in a sink and thus prevent the sink from being used for any other purpose as opposed to selecting a bucket?
4) What other explanation is there for sizable blood stains in the crotch area of female panties and leggings than menstraul blood where no women were wounded in any manner that could result in stuck stains int he crotch areas of their clothing? Particularly when 1 was menstruating and found with a tampon in her?
To anyone who is reasonably intelligent and objective the clothing is menstrual stained and of no relevance to the murders.
But some desperate, unreasonable Jeremy supporters insist this is proof that Sheila changed and washed her clothes after committing the murders.
They assert she did the ASS backwards thing of preserving tampons by not using one and wearing 2 pairs of panties and leggings to bed instead of a nightdress. She menstruated in them, killed everyone then washed, changed, soaked the stained clothing in buckets, inserted a tampon and put on a nightdress to kill herself.
So to go to sleep with the intention of waking up in the morning and carrying on her life as normal she wears regular clothes with no tampon knowing they will get bloodstained. But after deciding to kill herself she washes, inserts a tampon, soaks her stained clothes knowing she won't need them, and puts on a nightdress.
Aside from being so obvious that this fairytale is not being driven by evidence but rather being crafted to try to get around the evidence and the sheer stupidiy of these claims it still fails to achieve the intended objective. The key clothing of the killer would be the clothing covering the top half. That would have GSR and the most blood spatter fromt he victims. No such clothing was found nor any gloves though the killer clearly used gloves.
This mestrual stained clothing BS is a red herring to try to get peopel to forget about the nonexistent GSR/ blood spatter stained clothing and for some a fable of why she would get up. In fact one of my favorate fables from a Jeremy Supporter was one claiming his proves she w oke up, saw the blood in her pants and this made her go crazy and decide to kill everyone.
When someone dares to point out how much of a leap all these claims are then some of Jeremy's women come rushing in claiming a man can't address this and women know better and even spouting bogus religious claims of how Sheila would need to hide that she was on her period from June.
All this nonsense does is make clear how far Jeremy supporters will stretch things to try to find a way to pretend there is evidence to support his innocence.
